Skip to main content

Abstract

Aim: While only recently approved for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), many patients with MASH have taken glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for the treatment of comorbid Type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity. This real-world study evaluated treatment patterns, weight loss, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among patients with MASH who initiated GLP-1 RAs. Materials & methods: In a linked electronic health records (Veradigm Network EHR) and claims (Komodo Health) dataset, we identified adults (≥18 years old) with a MASH diagnosis who initiated GLP-1 RA treatment (1 July 2018 to 30 April 2023; index date = date of the first GLP-1 RA claim). Patients with other causes of liver disease or severe complications from MASH were excluded. We required ≥12 months of continuous enrollment pre- (baseline) and post-index (follow-up). Patients were stratified into high and low-dose subgroups. We also identified a comparator cohort of patients who initiated a different class of T2D medication (DPP4, SGLT2, or sulfonylurea) during the same time period. We captured patient characteristics, change in BMI, GLP-1 RA treatment patterns, liver-related events, healthcare utilization, and costs. Results: We identified 10,316 patients with MASH who initiated a GLP-1 RA (high dose: 2043 [19.8%]; low dose: 8273 [80.2%]) and 2915 who initiated a non-GLP-1 RA T2D medication. GLP-1 RA users were 52.7 years old and 64.3% female. A 5.8% decrease in the percentage of patients with class III obesity was observed among GLP-1 RA users (10.7% among high-dose users; 0.8% among non-users). Overall, 56.1% of GLP-1 RA users discontinued during the 12-month follow-up. Total costs among GLP-1 RA users and non users were $20,912 and $19,019 in the baseline period and $27,586 and $24,917 in the follow-up period, respectively. Medical costs among GLP-1 RA users were $16,293 (baseline) and $16,886 (follow-up). Results were similar for high and low-dose subgroups. Conclusion: Although some patients with MASH on GLP-1 RAs, particularly those taking higher dosages, may achieve weight loss, outcomes remain suboptimal with frequent discontinuation and high healthcare costs. Real-world GLP-1 RA utilization may be insufficient for resolving chronic metabolic issues, including MASH.

Plain language summary: An analysis of costs and medication usage among people with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis who were prescribed glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

What is this article about?

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is a liver disease that gets worse over time. MASH can lead to serious complications such as liver failure. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are used to treat obesity and Type 2 diabetes, which are common among people with MASH. This article is about the usage of GLP-1 RAs among people diagnosed with MASH. We looked at patient characteristics, BMI, patterns of medication treatment, reasons for discontinuation and changes in healthcare use and costs after starting GLP-1 RA. We also captured similar data for people who started a different Type 2 diabetes treatment to provide additional context.

What were the results?

People with MASH who took GLP-1 RA tended to lose weight, measured as a decrease in the percentage of patients with a very high BMI (≥40). This was not observed in people who started a different Type 2 diabetes treatment. More than half of people who started GLP-1 RAs stopped treatment for at least 45 days within 1 year. Roughly half of people who stopped treatment did not restart treatment. Side effects were the most common reason for stopping treatment. Total healthcare costs were $27,586, and nonmedicine-related costs were $16,886 in the year after starting treatment.

What do the results mean?

GLP-1 RA may be effective in promoting weight loss among people with MASH, but these medications may not address other issues among people with MASH as healthcare use and costs remain high.

Supplementary Material

File (supplementary data 1.xlsx)
File (supplementary data 2.docx)
File (supplementary data 3.docx)
File (supplementary data 4.docx)
File (supplementary data 5.docx)
File (supplementary data 6.xlsx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V et al. A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology 78(6), 1966 (2023).
2.
Sheka AC, Adeyi O, Thompson J, Hameed B, Crawford PA, Ikramuddin S. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a review. JAMA 323(12), 1175–1183 (2020).
3.
Estes C, Anstee QM, Arias-Loste MT et al. Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016–2030. J. Hepatol. 69(4), 896–904 (2018).
4.
Younossi ZM, Golabi P, de Avila L et al. The global epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hepatol. 71(4), 793–801 (2019).
• Review of prevalence of Type 2 diabetes among patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).
5.
Quek J, Chan KE, Wong ZY et al. Global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in the overweight and obese population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 8(1), 20–30 (2023).
• Review of the prevalence of obesity among patients with MASH.
6.
Estes C, Razavi H, Loomba R, Younossi Z, Sanyal AJ. Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 67(1), 123–133 (2018).
7.
European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO clinical practice guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Obesity Facts 17(4), 374–443 (2024).
8.
Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS et al. AASLD practice guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 77(5), 1797–1835 (2023).
9.
Cusi K, Isaacs S, Barb D et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in primary care and endocrinology clinical settings: co-sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). Endocr. Pract. 28(5), 528–562 (2022).
10.
Koutoukidis DA, Koshiaris C, Henry JA et al. The effect of the magnitude of weight loss on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 115, 154455 (2021).
11.
Vilar-Gomez E, Martinez-Perez Y, Calzadilla-Bertot L et al. Weight loss through lifestyle modification significantly reduces features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 149(2), 367–378.e5 (2015).
12.
Malespin MH, Barritt AS, Watkins SE et al. Weight loss and weight regain in usual clinical practice: results from the TARGET-NASH observational cohort. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20(10), 2393–2395.e4 (2022).
13.
Nauck MA, Quast DR, Wefers J, Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes – state-of-the-art. Molecular Metabolism 46, 101102 (2021).
14.
Popoviciu M-S, Păduraru L, Yahya G, Metwally K, Cavalu S. Emerging role of GLP-1 agonists in obesity: a comprehensive review of randomised controlled trials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24(13), 10449 (2023).
15.
Bethel MA, Patel RA, Merrill P et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 6(2), 105–113 (2018).
16.
Michos ED, Lopez-Jimenez F, Gulati M. Role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in achieving weight loss and improving cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and obesity. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 12(11), e029282 (2023).
17.
Newsome PN, Buchholtz K, Cusi K et al. A placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneous semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 384(12), 1113–1124 (2021).
18.
Mantovani A, Petracca G, Beatrice G, Csermely A, Lonardo A, Targher G. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Metabolites 11(2), 73 (2021).
19.
Volpe S, Lisco G, Fanelli M et al. Once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide improves fatty liver disease in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a 52-week prospective real-life study. Nutrients 14(21), 4673 (2022).
20.
Sanyal AJ, Newsome PN, Kliers I et al. Phase III trial of semaglutide in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 392(21), 2089–2099 (2025).
•• Phase III trial results of SC semaglutide efficacy among patients with MASH.
21.
Elm E von, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 4(10), e296 (2007).
22.
Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Li L et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists and risk for cirrhosis and related complications in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. JAMA Intern. Med. 184(11), 1314–1323 (2024).
23.
Younossi ZM, Tampi RP, Racila A et al. Economic and clinical burden of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with Type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care 43(2), 283–289 (2020).
24.
Fishman J, Tapper EB, Dodge S et al. The incremental cost of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and Type 2 diabetes in the United States using real-world data. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 39(11), 1425–1429 (2023).
25.
Hagström H, Adams LA, Allen AM et al. Administrative coding in electronic health care record-based research of NAFLD: an expert panel consensus statement. Hepatology 74(1), 474–482 (2021).
26.
Hagström H, Adams LA, Allen AM et al. The future of International Classification of Diseases coding in steatotic liver disease: an expert panel Delphi consensus statement. Hepatol Commun. 8(2), e0386 (2024).
• Expert consensus on billing codes to be used to identify likely patients with MASH.
27.
Centers for Diease Control and Prevention. Adult BMI Categories (2024). Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/bmi/adult-calculator/bmi-categories.html
28.
Quan H, Li B, Couris CM et al. Updating and validating the Charlson Comorbidity Index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 173(6), 676–682 (2011).
29.
Glasheen WP, Renda A, Dong Y. Diabetes complications severity index (DCSI)—update and ICD-10 translation. J. Diabetes Complications 31(6), 1007–1013 (2017).
30.
Quek RGW, Fox KM, Wang L, Li L, Gandra SR, Wong ND. A US claims-based analysis of real-world lipid-lowering treatment patterns in patients with high cardiovascular disease risk or a previous coronary event. Am. J. Cardiol. 117(4), 495–500 (2016).
31.
White GE, Shu I, Rometo D, Arnold J, Korytkowski M, Luo J. Real-world weight-loss effectiveness of glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists among patients with Type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Obesity 31(2), 537–544 (2023).
32.
Weiss T, Yang L, Carr RD et al. Real-world weight change, adherence, and discontinuation among patients with Type 2 diabetes initiating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the UK. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 10(1), e002517 (2022).
33.
Carls GS, Tan R, Zhu JY et al. Real-world weight change among patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sulfonylureas for Type 2 diabetes and the influence of medication adherence. Obes. Sci. Pract. 3(3), 342–351 (2017).
34.
Jensen SBK, Blond MB, Sandsdal RM et al. Healthy weight loss maintenance with exercise, GLP-1 receptor agonist, or both combined followed by one year without treatment: a post-treatment analysis of a randomised placebo-controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine 69, 102475 (2024).
35.
Wilding JPH, Batterham RL, Davies M et al. Weight regain and cardiometabolic effects after withdrawal of semaglutide: the STEP 1 trial extension. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 24(8), 1553–1564 (2022).
36.
Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M et al. Effect of continued weekly subcutaneous semaglutide vs placebo on weight loss maintenance in adults with overweight or obesity: the STEP 4 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(14), 1414–1425 (2021).
37.
Do D, Lee T, Peasah SK, Good CB, Inneh A, Patel U. GLP-1 receptor agonist discontinuation among patients with obesity and/or Type 2 diabetes. JAMA Netw. Open 7(5), e2413172 (2024).
• Prior estimates of GLP-1 discontinuation in patients with obesity or Type 2 diabetes.
38.
Weiss T, Carr RD, Pal S et al. Real-world adherence and discontinuation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists therapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in the United States. Patient Prefer. Adherence 14, 2337–2345 (2020).
39.
Polonsky WH, Arora R, Faurby M, Fernandes J, Liebl A. Higher rates of persistence and adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes initiating once-weekly vs daily injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in US clinical practice (STAY study). Diabetes Ther. 13(1), 175–187 (2022).
40.
Tapper EB, Bonafede M, Fishman J et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs of care in the United States for patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Med. Econ. 26(1), 348–356 (2023).
• Prior study on overall costs of patients with MASH stratified by fibrosis-4 score.
41.
Wong RJ, Kachru N, Martinez DJ, Moynihan M, Ozbay AB, Gordon SC. Real-world comorbidity burden, health care utilization, and costs of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients with advanced liver diseases. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 55(10), 891–902 (2021).
42.
Gordon SC, Fraysse J, Li S, Ozbay AB, Wong RJ. Disease severity is associated with higher healthcare utilization in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis medicare patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 115(4), 562–574 (2020).
43.
Rinella ME, Sookoian S. From NAFLD to MASLD: updated naming and diagnosis criteria for fatty liver disease. J. Lipid Res. 65(1), 100485 (2024).