Skip to main content
Open access
Short Communication
12 July 2019

Ability to pay for medication: a clustering analysis of 1404 patients with the Patient Financial Eligibility Tool

Abstract

Aim: The study was conducted to understand how key determinants of the Patient Financial Eligibility Tool (PFET), a previously validated tool for assessing patients’ ability to contribute to their medication costs, vary across countries. Materials & methods: A clustering analysis was conducted on economic data from 1404 patients from Thailand (n = 947), the UAE (n = 347) and Mexico (n = 110). Results: The analysis identified seven patient clusters, including globally wealthy or poor patients (14%/48%) and those with only selectively increased PFET economic indicators (38%), and revealed country-specific differences in the correlation between PFET metrics and patients’ overall economic status. Conclusion: The PFET is a versatile tool that can be adapted to each country’s economic context to assess patients’ ability to contribute to their medication costs.

Supplementary Material

File (supp_video_1_-_clusters_3d_biplot.pptx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
1.
Rutstein O, Johnson K. The DHS Health Index. DHS Comparative Reports 6 (2004). https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/CR6/CR6.pdf
2.
Chakraborty NM, Fry K, Behl R, Longfield K. Simplified asset indices to measure wealth and equity in health programs: a reliability and validity analysis using survey data from 16 countries. Global Health Sci. Pract. 4(1), 141–154 (2016).
3.
Davies JB. An overview of personal wealth. In: Personal Wealth From A Global Perspective, Davies BJ (Ed.). Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 1–23 (2008).
4.
Filmer D, Pritchett LH. Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography 38(1), 115–132 (2001).
• Provides key background information on wealth index development.
5.
Vyas S, Kumaranayake L. Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis. Health Policy Plan 21(6), 459–468 (2006).
6.
Saba J, Audureau E, Bize M, Koloshuk B, Ladner J. Development and validation of a multilateral index to determine economic status in developing countries: the Patient Financial Eligibility Tool (PFET). Popul Health Manag. 16(2), 82–89 (2013).
• Provides information on the Patient Financial Eligibility Tool initial development and validation.
7.
Schneider F, Buehn A, Montenegro CE. Shadow economies all over the world: new estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007. Policy Research Working Paper. The World Bank (2010). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/311991468037132740/pdf/WPS5356.pdf
8.
Kohonen T, Self-organizing maps (3rd Ed.) In: Springer Series in Information Sciences. Huang ST, Kohonen T, Schroeder RM. (Eds.). Springer, NY, USA (2001).
9.
Gao S, Mutter S, Casey A, Makinen VP. Numero: a statistical framework to define multivariable subgroups in complex population-based datasets. Int. J. Epidemiol. (2018) (Epub ahead of print).
• Provides key information on the Self-Organized Maps methodology and its implementation within the Numero statistical framework.
10.
Gabriel KR. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58, 453–467 (1971).
11.
Smits J, Steendijk R. The International Wealth Index (IWI). Soc. Indic. Res. 122(1), 65–85 (2015).
12.
Rutstein O, Staveteig S. Making the demographic and Health Surveys Wealth Index comparable. DHS Methodological Reports 9 (2014). www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MR9/MR9.pdf