Skip to main content
Free access
Research Article
9 August 2019

Negative pressure wound therapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficiency and safety of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the total hip and knee arthroplasty, we conducted a meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials. Methods: Potential academic articles were identified from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Springer and ScienceDirect. Secondary sources were identified from the references of the included literature. RevMan 5.1 was used to analyze the pooled data. Results: Six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed more superficial surgical site infection and blisters in patients with total knee arthroplasty. There were no significant differences between two groups in total infection and total complications. Conclusion: NPWT decreased the incidence of superficial surgical site infection. More blisters were noticed in patients with NPWT after total knee arthroplasty.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

1.
Ridgeway S, Wilson J, Charlet A, Kafatos G, Pearson A, Coello R. Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 87(6), 844–850 (2005).
2.
Andersson AE, Bergh I, Karlsson J, Nilsson K. Patients’ experiences of acquiring a deep surgical site infection: an interview study. Am. J. Infect. Control 38(9), 711–717 (2010).
3.
Puhto T, Puhto AP, Vielma M, Syrjala H. Infection triples the cost of a primary joint arthroplasty. Infect. Dis. (Lond.) 51(5), 348–355 (2019).
4.
Manrique J, Alijanipour P, Heller S, Dove M, Parvizi J. Increased risk of heterotopic ossification following revision hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection. Arch. Bone Jt Surg. 6(6), 486–491 (2018).
5.
McAlister IP, Perry KI, Mara KC, Hanssen AD, Berry DJ, Abdel MP. Two-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty for infection is associated with a high rate of dislocation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 101(4), 322–329 (2019).
6.
Lambert KV, Hayes P, McCarthy M. Vacuum assisted closure: a review of development and current applications. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 29(3), 219–226 (2005).
7.
Gomoll AH, Lin A, Harris MB. Incisional vacuum-assisted closure therapy. J. Orthop. Trauma 20(10), 705–709 (2006).
8.
Howell RD, Hadley S, Strauss E, Pelham FR. Blister formation with negative pressure dressings after total knee arthroplasty. Curr. Orthop. Pract. 22(2), 176–179 (2011).
9.
Pachowsky M, Gusinde J, Klein A et al. Negative pressure wound therapy to prevent seromas and treat surgical incisions after total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop. 36(4), 719–722 (2012).
10.
Matsumoto T, Parekh SG. Use of negative pressure wound therapy on closed surgical incision after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 36(7), 787–794 (2015).
11.
Newman JM, Siqueira M, Klika AK, Molloy RM, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Use of closed incisional negative pressure wound therapy after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients at high risk for infection: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J. Arthroplasty 34(3), 554–559 (2019).
12.
Giannini S, Mazzotti A, Luciani D et al. Postoperative wound management with negative pressure wound therapy in knee and hip surgery: a randomised control trial. J. Wound Care 27(8), 520–525 (2018).
13.
Helito CP, Bueno DK, Giglio PN, Bonadio MB, Pecora JR, Demange MK. Negative-pressure wound therapy in the treatment of complex injuries after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop. Bras. 25(2), 85–88 (2017).
14.
Miyahara HS, Serzedello FR, Ejnisman L, Lima A, Vicente J, Helito CP. Incisional negative-pressure wound therapy in revision total hip arthroplasty due to infection. Acta Ortop. Bras. 26(5), 300–304 (2018).
15.
Manoharan V, Grant AL, Harris AC, Hazratwala K, Wilkinson MP, McEwen PJ. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy vs conventional dry dressings after primary knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. J. Arthroplasty 31(11), 2487–2494 (2016).
16.
Gillespie BM, Rickard CM, Thalib L et al. Use of negative-pressure wound dressings to prevent surgical site complications after primary hip arthroplasty: a pilot RCT. Surg. Innov. 22(5), 488–495 (2015).
17.
Karlakki SL, Hamad AK, Whittall C, Graham NM, Banerjee RD, Kuiper JH. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint Res. 5(8), 328–337 (2016).
18.
Carroll K, Dowsey M, Choong P, Peel T. Risk factors for superficial wound complications in hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20(2), 130–135 (2014).
19.
Karlakki S, Brem M, Giannini S, Khanduja V, Stannard J, Martin R. Negative pressure wound therapy for management of the surgical incision in orthopaedic surgery: a review of evidence and mechanisms for an emerging indication. Bone Joint Res. 2(12), 276–284 (2013).
20.
Siqueira MB, Ramanathan D, Klika AK, Higuera CA, Barsoum WK. Role of negative pressure wound therapy in total hip and knee arthroplasty. World J. Orthop. 7(1), 30–37 (2016).
21.
Song KH, Kim ES, Kim YK et al. Differences in the risk factors for surgical site infection between total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the Korean Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System (KONIS). Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 33(11), 1086–1093 (2012).
22.
Kopp SL, Berbari EF, Osmon DR et al. The impact of anesthetic management on surgical site infections in patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Anesth. Analg. 121(5), 1215–1221 (2015).
23.
Cooper HJ, Bas MA. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy versus antimicrobial dressings after revision hip and knee surgery: a comparative study. J. Arthroplasty 31(5), 1047–1052 (2016).