Skip to main content
Free access
Research Article
4 December 2017

Costs of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer

Abstract

Aim: Trastuzumab is available in an intravenous (iv.) and a subcutaneous (sc.) formulation. The objective of this study was to estimate the costs of administration of iv. and sc. trastuzumab treatment. Materials & methods: Via interviews, we identified all the activities associated with iv. and sc. administration. The outcome was time estimates. To estimate the administration costs, the time estimates were valued by average gross wages. Results: The iv. administration takes longer time as infusion time is longer (25 or 85 min). The iv. administration is associated with higher cost for 17 cycles; €971 (€1858 vs €887). Conclusion: sc. administration is associated with lower administration costs. Switching patients from iv. to sc. would make it possible to treat more patients without increasing the personnel resources.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. Cancer incidence in Denmark, The Cancer Register 2015 [Nye Kræfttilfælde i Danmark, Cancerregisteret 2015]. www.sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk.
2.
European Medicines Agency. Annex 1. Summary of product characteristics (Herceptin). Report No.: 15/09/2016. www.ema.europa.eu/ema/.
3.
Ismael G, Hegg R, Muehlbauer S et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive, clinical stage I–III breast cancer (HannaH study): a Phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 13(9), 869–878 (2012).
•• Provides information about the effect and safety of intravenous (iv.) versus subcutaneous (sc.) administration.
4.
Jackisch C, Kim S-B, Semiglazov V et al. Subcutaneous versus intravenous formulation of trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: updated results from the Phase III HannaH study. Ann. Oncol. 26(2), 320–325 (2015).
•• Provides updated information about the effect and safety of iv. versus sc. administration.
5.
Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Kvalitetsindikatorrapport for Brystkræft 2015. Landsdækkende Klinisk Kvalitetsdatabase for Brystkræft. Databasernes Fællessekretariat. www.dbcg.dk.
6.
Danish Regions and Municipalities Office for Wage Statistics [Kommunernes og Regionerens Løndatakontor]. www.fldnet.dk/statistik/lpx7/.
8.
Sørensen J. Analysis of differences in resource use and costs for intravenous and subcutaneous administration of Herceptin treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer [Analyse af forskelle i ressourceforbrug og omkostninger ved intravenøs og subkutan administration af Herceptin til behandling af HER2 positiv brystkræft]. University of Southern Denmark, Denmark (2014).
9.
Amgros. Værdisætning af enhedsomkostninger (2017). www.amgros.dk.
10.
Sundhedsdatastyrelsen. Tariffs. 2017 [Takstsystem. Vejledning. 2017] (2017). www.drg.dk.
11.
Jakobsen M, Rasmussen SR, Kjelberg J. Differences in costs of administration of biologics – a case study within gastroenterology [Forskelle i omkostninger ved administrering af biologiske lægemidler – Et casestudie inden for gastroenterologien]. KORA (2015). www.kora.dk/media/3887491/10724_administrering_biologiske_laegemidler.pdf.
12.
Ponzetti C, Canciani M, Farina M, Era S, Walzer S. Potential resource and cost saving analysis of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration for rituximab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and for trastuzumab in breast cancer in 17 Italian hospitals based on a systematic survey. Clin. Outcomes Res. 8, 227–233 (2016).
• Information and results from a similar study in an Italian setting.
13.
Olofsson S, Norrlid H, Karlsson E, Wilking U, Ragnarson Tennvall G. Societal cost of subcutaneous and intravenous trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer – an observational study prospectively recording resource utilization in a Swedish healthcare setting. Breast Edinb. Scotl. 29, 140–146 (2016).
• Information and results from a similar study in a Swedish setting.
14.
Rule S, Collins GP, Samanta K. Subcutaneous vs intravenous rituximab in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a time and motion study in the United Kingdom. J. Med. Econ. 17(7), 459–468 (2014).
15.
Pivot X, Gligorov J, Müller V et al. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PrefHer): an open-label randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 14(10), 962–970 (2013).
•• Provides information about patients’ preferences for sc. and iv. administration.
16.
Pearson S-A, Ringland CL, Ward RL. Trastuzumab and metastatic breast cancer: trastuzumab use in Australia – monitoring the effect of an expensive medicine access program. J. Clin. Oncol. 25(24), 3688–3693 (2007).