Skip to main content
Search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
Open access
Short Report
21 July 2026

Clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program for older adults: a nonrandomized controlled trial

Authors: Folasade Phillips https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-7133 [email protected], Sandhya Yadav https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-3784, Cynthia Castro Sweet https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6860-4095, Rachel NS Foster Kirk https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1583-4668, Mindy Hong https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2755-3812, Samuel Mink https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6380-9662, and Jeffrey Krauss https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-3052Author Info & Affiliations
Volume 15, Number 9
https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2026-0070
PDFFormats

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a digitally delivered balance program relative to an attention-control comparison group in older adults at risk for falls. Materials & methods: This nonrandomized controlled trial recruited adults aged 65 years and older with moderate-to-high fall risk. Participants were assigned to a digital balance program (exercise therapy, education and health coaching) or an attention-control group (education materials). Outcomes were assessed via self-report surveys at baseline and 3 months. Analyses including all assigned participants evaluated changes in fall rate, fall severity, physical function and medical care utilization. Results: A total of 687 participants were included in the analysis (intervention: n = 344; attention-control: n = 343). The mean age was 68.8 years, and 74.1% of participants were female. In the primary analysis, adjusting for baseline factors, the intervention group demonstrated a 37% lower fall rate compared with the attention-control group at 3 months (IRR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.48–0.82, p < 0.001). The intervention group also demonstrated significant improvement in physical functioning (β = 6.86, 95% CI: 3.80–9.92, p < 0.001) and lower odds of emergency department visits (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24–0.76, p = 0.004). Intervention participants engaged in an average of 25.2 exercise therapy sessions over the 12-week period. Conclusion: Findings suggest that participation in the digital balance program was associated with reductions in self-reported fall rates, improvements in self-reported physical function, and lower odds of emergency department utilization. High engagement levels further indicate that digitally delivered programs offer a viable option for improving health outcomes in this population.
Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06868680 retrospectively registered 6 March 2025.

Plain language summary: Can a digital exercise program help prevent falls in older adults?

What is this article about?

Falls are a major cause of injury for adults aged 65 and older. While exercise can help prevent falls, many older adults find it difficult to attend in-person classes due to transportation or mobility issues. This study looked at whether a digital balance program (delivered through an app on a smartphone or tablet) could help reduce falls. The program included exercise therapy, education and support from a health coach and physical therapist. Researchers compared 344 participants who used the app to 343 participants who received only educational emails to see if the app helped reduce falls and improve overall health.

What were the results?

After 3 months, participants using the digital program reported significantly fewer self-reported falls compared with the group that only received educational emails. As part of an exploratory analysis, participants using the app also reported significant improvements in their physical ability to move and do daily tasks. In another exploratory finding, those in the digital program group reported fewer emergency department visits during the study. Participants were highly engaged with the app, completing an average of two exercise sessions per week.

What do the results mean?

These findings suggest that digital exercise programs can be an effective and accessible way for older adults with baseline digital literacy and device access to improve their balance and physical health from home. By reducing patient-reported fall risks and emergency hospital visits, such programs may help tech-proficient older adults live independently for longer while reducing the burden on the healthcare system.

Supplementary Material

File (supplementary materials.docx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Burns E, Kakara R. Deaths from falls among persons aged ≥65 years — United States, 2007–2016. Morb. Mortal Wkly Rep. 67(18), 509–514 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
2.
CDC WISQARS – Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (Accessed 6 February 2026). https://wisqars.cdc.gov/
Google Scholar
3.
Kakara R, Bergen G, Burns E, Stevens M. Nonfatal and fatal falls among adults aged ≥65years – United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 72 (35), 938–943 (2023).
PubMed
Google Scholar
4.
Florence CS, Bergen G, Atherly A, Burns E, Stevens J, Drake C. Medical costs of fatal and nonfatal falls in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 66(4), 693–698 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
5.
Adam CE, Fitzpatrick AL, Leary CS, Ilango SD, Phelan EA, Semmens EO. The impact of falls on activities of daily living in older adults: a retrospective cohort analysis. PLoS ONE 19(1), e0294017 (2024).
PubMed
Google Scholar
6.
Tricco AC, Thomas SM, Radhakrishnan A et al. Interventions for social isolation in older adults who have experienced a fall: a systematic review. BMJ Open 12(3), e056540 (2022).
PubMed
Google Scholar
7.
Hallford DJ, Nicholson G, Sanders K, McCabe MP. The association between anxiety and falls: a meta-analysis. J. Gerontol. Ser. B. 72(5), 729–741 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
8.
US Preventive Services Task Force. Interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 332(1), 51–57 (2024).
PubMed
Google Scholar
9.
Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK et al. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (1), CD012424 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
•• This comprehensive Cochrane review establishes the rigorous evidence base linking exercise interventions to reduced fall rates in community-dwelling older adults.
10.
Vincenzo JL, Patton SK, Lefler LL et al. Older adults' perceptions regarding the role of physical therapists in falls prevention: a qualitative investigation. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 45(3), E127–E136 (2022).
PubMed
Google Scholar
11.
Mansson L, Lundin-Olsson L, Skelton DA et al. Older adults' preferences for, adherence to and experiences of two self-management falls prevention home exercise programmes: a comparison between a digital programme and a paper booklet. BMC Geriatr. 20, 209 (2020).
PubMed
Google Scholar
• Compares user experiences and adherence between digital and paper-based exercise programs, observing higher engagement levels with the app-based modality among older adults.
12.
Bernocchi P, Giordano A, Pintavalle G et al. Feasibility and clinical efficacy of a multidisciplinary home-telehealth program to prevent falls in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 20(3), 340–346 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
13.
Lohman MC, Crow RS, DiMilia PR, Nicklett EJ, Bruce ML, Batsis JA. Operationalization and validation of the Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) Fall Risk Algorithm in a nationally representative sample. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 71(12), 1191–1197 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
14.
Jacobson CL, Foster LC, Arul H, Rees A, Stafford RS. A digital health fall prevention program for older adults: feasibility study. JMIR Form. Res. 5(12), e30558 (2021).
PubMed
Google Scholar
15.
Garrard L, Boyle DK, Simon M, Dunton N, Gajewski B. Reliability and validity of the NDNQI® injury falls measure. West. J. Nurs. Res. 38(1), 111–128 (2016).
PubMed
Google Scholar
• Provides the standardized definitions for classifying fall severity categories (minor, moderate, and major) utilized in this study’s outcome measures.
16.
Bohannon RW, DePasquale L. Physical functioning scale of the Short-Form (SF) 36: internal consistency and validity with older adults. J. Geriatr. Phys. Ther. 33(1), 16 (2010).
PubMed
Google Scholar
17.
Kempen GIJM, Yardley L, Van Haastregt JCM et al. The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age. Ageing 37(1), 45–50 (2008).
PubMed
Google Scholar
18.
Li F, Harmer P, Fitzgerald K et al. Effectiveness of a therapeutic Tai Ji Quan intervention vs a multimodal exercise intervention to prevent falls among older adults at high risk of falling: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 178(10), 1301–1310 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
• A pivotal clinical trial whose fall reduction outcomes informed the sample size calculation and benchmark expectations for this study’s multimodal intervention.
19.
Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JCT. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 56(12), 2234–2243 (2008).
PubMed
Google Scholar
20.
Schwenk M, Lauenroth A, Stock C et al. Definitions and methods of measuring and reporting on injurious falls in randomised controlled fall prevention trials: a systematic review. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12, 50 (2012).
PubMed
Google Scholar
21.
Bhasin S, Gill TM, Reuben DB et al. A randomized trial of a multifactorial strategy to prevent serious fall injuries. N. Engl. J. Med. 383(2), 129–140 (2020).
PubMed
Google Scholar
•• The large-scale STRIDE study results illustrate the statistical challenge of detecting significant reductions in infrequent serious fall injuries, providing critical context for interpreting severity outcomes in smaller trials.
22.
Sherrington C, Tiedemann A, Fairhall N, Close JCT, Lord SR. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated meta-analysis and best practice recommendations. NSW Public Health Bull. 22(4), 78–83 (2011).
Google Scholar
• Outlines the observed dose–response relationship for fall prevention, suggesting that approximately 2 h of balance challenge per week are associated with optimal outcomes.
23.
Sherrington C, Michaleff ZA, Fairhall N et al. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Sports Med. 51(24), 1750–1758 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
24.
Pickens G, Smith MW, McDermott KW, Mummert A, Karaca Z. Trends in treatment costs of U.S. emergency department visits. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 58, 89–94 (2022).
PubMed
Google Scholar
25.
Ashe MC, dos Santos IK, Erome J, Grant J, Mollins J, Soh SE. Systematic review of adherence to technology-based falls prevention programs for community-dwelling older adults: reimagining future interventions. PLoS Digit. Health 3(9), e0000579 (2024).
PubMed
Google Scholar
• A recent systematic review benchmarking adherence in digital fall prevention programs, offering a contemporary comparison for the engagement levels observed in this intervention.
26.
Zecevic AA, Salmoni AW, Speechley M, Vandervoort AA. Defining a fall and reasons for falling: comparisons among the views of seniors, health care providers, and the research literature. Gerontologist 46(3), 367–376 (2006).
PubMed
Google Scholar
27.
Mace RA, Mattos MK, Vranceanu AM. Older adults can use technology: why healthcare professionals must overcome ageism in digital health. Transl. Behav. Med. 12(12), 1102–1105 (2022).
PubMed
Google Scholar
• Discussed the feasibility of digital inclusion for older adults, supporting the observation that this population can effectively engage with app-based health interventions.