Cost–effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure
Publication: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Abstract
Aim: To assesses the cost–effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes. Materials & methods: A de novo cost–effectiveness model with a Markov structure was created for patients hospitalized for heart failure with comorbid diabetes. Outcomes of interest included hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and all-cause mortality measured over a 30-year time horizon. Baseline event frequencies were derived from published real-world data studies; sotagliflozin's efficacy was estimated from SOLOIST-WHF. Health benefits were calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs included pharmaceutical costs, rehospitalization, emergency room visits and adverse events. Economic value was measured using the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: Sotagliflozin use decreased annualized rehospitalization rates by 34.5% (0.228 vs 0.348, difference: -0.120), annualized emergency department visits by 40.0% (0.091 vs 0.153, difference: -0.061) and annualized mortality by 18.0% (0.298 vs 0.363, difference: -0.065) relative to standard of care, resulting in a net gain in QAYs of 0.425 for sotagliflozin versus standard of care. Incremental costs using sotagliflozin increased by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon of the patient, driven largely by increased pharmaceutical cost. Estimated ICER for sotagliflozin relative to standard of care was $45,596 per QALY. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin is a cost-effective addition to standard of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes.
Shareable abstract
Sotagliflozin for heart failure and diabetes reduced rehospitalization, emergency department visits and mortality by 34.5, 40.0 and 18.0%, respectively, versus standard of care. This treatment is cost effective, producing and ICER of $45,596 per QALY.
Plain language summary
What is this article about?
In USA, approximately 6.7 million suffer from heart failure causing approximately 84,000 deaths annually. Sotagliflozin, a treatment used to treat patients with heart failure and comorbid diabetes, has shown positive results from clinical trials, but this study examines whether it is also cost effective.
What were the results?
The de novo economic model developed showed that sotagliflozin reduced rehospitalization, emergency department visits and mortality relative to standard of care. While sotagliflozin did increase cost (by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon), it also increased health benefits (QALYs increased by 0.425).
What do the results mean?
Based on the estimated cost–effectiveness (ICER= $45,596), sotagliflozin would be considered cost-effective for most widely used willingness to pay thresholds in USA.
Supplementary Material
File (supplementary materials.docx)
- Download
- 132.48 KB
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
1.
Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation 143, e254–e743 (2021).
2.
van der Wal HH, van Deursen VM, van der Meer P, Voors AA. Comorbidities in heart failure. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 243, 35–66 (2017).
3.
Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Xu H, DeVore AD et al. Temporal trends and factors associated with diabetes mellitus among patients hospitalized with heart failure: findings from get with the guidelines-heart failure registry. Am. Heart J. 182, 9–20 (2016).
4.
Straw S, McGinlay M, Witte KK. Four pillars of heart failure: contemporary pharmacological therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Open Heart 8(1), e001585 (2021).
5.
Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Steg PG et al. Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 117–128 (2021).
• This research article presents key efficacy and safety findings about sotagliflozin from the SOLOIST-WHF trial (NCT03521934), a phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Our investigation is built upon the identical study population, using the efficacy and safety data from the SOLOIST-WHF.
6.
Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Pitt B et al. Sotagliflozin in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 129–139 (2021).
• This research article document trial results in SCORED (NCT03315143) trial. The results further demonstrated sotagliflozin's efficacy in improved cardiovascular outcomes for patients with HF, Type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
7.
Parizo JT, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Salomon JA et al. Cost–effectiveness of dapagliflozin for treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 6, 926–935 (2021).
• This cost–effectiveness analysis (CEA) study for dapagliflozin employed Markov models with health states of stable disease, hospitalization and death. Our investigation adopts a comparable model structure.
8.
Reifsnider OS, Kansal AR, Franke J et al. Cost–effectiveness of empagliflozin in the UK in an empa-reg outcome subgroup with Type II diabetes and heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 7(6), 3910–3918 (2020).
9.
Adena MA, Hamann G, Sindone AP. Cost–effectiveness of ivabradine in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Heart Lung Circ. 28, 414–422 (2019).
• This CEA study for Ivabradine employed Markov models with health states of stable disease, hospitalization and death. Our investigation adopts a comparable model structure.
10.
Alsumali A, Djatche LM, Briggs A et al. cost–effectiveness of vericiguat for the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following a worsening heart failure event from a us Medicare perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 39, 1343–13554 (2021).
• This CEA study for vericiguat provides utility estimates for heart failure by health states for our investigation.
11.
Gaziano TA, Fonarow GC, Claggett B et al. Cost–effectiveness analysis of sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. JAMA Cardiol. 1, 666–672 (2016).
• This CEA study for sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril employed Markov models with health states of stable disease, hospitalization and death. Our investigation adopts a comparable model structure.
12.
Perera K, Ademi Z, Liew D, Zomer E. Sacubitril-valsartan versus enalapril for acute decompensated heart failure: a cost–effectiveness analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 28, 966–972 (2021).
• This CEA study for sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril employed Markov models with health states of stable disease, hospitalization and death. Our investigation adopts a comparable model structure.
13.
Blecker S, Ladapo JA, Doran KM, Goldfeld KS, Katz S. Emergency department visits for heart failure and subsequent hospitalization or observation unit admission. Am. Heart J. 168, 901–908 (2014).
14.
Kilgore M, Patel HK, Kielhorn A, Maya JF, Sharma P. Economic burden of hospitalizations of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. Risk Manag. Healthcare Pol. 10, 63–70 (2017).
15.
Gupta A, Allen LA, Bhatt DL et al. Association of the hospital readmissions reduction program implementation with readmission and mortality outcomes in heart failure. JAMA Cardiol. 3, 44–53 (2018).
16.
Greiner MA, Hammill BG, Fonarow GC et al. Predicting costs among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure. Am. J. Cardiol. 109, 705–711 (2012).
17.
Almalki Z, Alatawi Y, Alharbi A et al. Cost–effectiveness of more intensive blood pressure treatment in patients with high risk of cardiovascular disease in Saudi Arabia: a modelling study of meta-analysis. Int. J. Hypertens 2019, 6019401 (2019).
18.
Bermingham SL, Ashe JF. Systematic review of the impact of urinary tract infections on health-related quality of life. BJU Int. 110, E830–E836 (2012).
19.
Hagiwara Y, Shiroiwa T, Shimozuma K et al. Impact of adverse events on health utility and health-related quality of life in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: results from the select bc study. Pharmacoeconomics 36, 215–223 (2018).
20.
Delgleize E, Leeuwenkamp O, Theodorou E, Van de Velde N. Cost–effectiveness analysis of routine pneumococcal vaccination in the UK: a comparison of the Phid-CV vaccine and the PCV-13 vaccine using a Markov model. BMJ Open 6, e010776 (2016).
21.
Wyld M, Morton RL, Hayen A, Howard K, Webster AC. A systematic review and meta-analysis of utility-based quality of life in chronic kidney disease treatments. PLOS Med. 9(9), e1001307 (2012).
22.
Lee J, Lee E. Assessment of utility for heart failure using visual analogue scale (vas), time-trade off (tto) and euroqol-5 dimension (eq-5d) in the Korean general population. Value Health 19, A868–A869 (2016).
23.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Measuring price change in the CPI: medical care (2022). Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/medical-care.htm
24.
Merative. Micromedex Red Book. https://www.merative.com/micromedex-training-center/red-book
25.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare inpatient hospitals – by geography and service (2019). Available at: https://data.cms.gov/provider-summary-by-type-of-service/medicare-inpatient-hospitals/medicare-inpatient-hospitals-by-geography-and-service
26.
Reeves GC, Alhurani AS, Frazier SK et al. The association of comorbid diabetes mellitus and symptoms of depression with all-cause mortality and cardiac rehospitalization in patients with heart failure. BMJ Open Diabet. Res. Care 3, e000077 (2015).
27.
Pitt B, Bhatt DL, Szarek M et al. The effect of the dual sglt1 and 2 inhibitor sotagliflozin on cardiovascular mortality and hospital readmission rates for heart failure at 30 and 90 days post discharge in patients with Type II diabetes hospitalized for worsening heart failure in the soloist-whf trial. Circulation 146, A10209–A10209 (2022).
28.
Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. 2020–2023 Value Assessment Framework. Available at: https://icer.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ICER_2020_2023_VAF_102220.pdf
29.
Nguyen B-N, Mital S, Bugden S, Nguyen HV. Cost–effectiveness of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Int. J. Cardiol. 376, 83–89 (2023).
30.
Isaza N, Calvachi P, Raber I et al. Cost–effectiveness of dapagliflozin for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. JAMA Network Open 4, e2114501–e2114501 (2021).
31.
Congressional Budget Office. Congressional Budget Office The prices that commercial health insurers and medicare pay for hospitals' and physicians' services (2022). Available at: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57422
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2024 The Authors. This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License
History
Received: 8 January 2024
Accepted: 26 April 2024
Published online: 21 May 2024
Keywords:
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Article usage data only available from February 2023. Historical article usage data, showing the number of article downloads, is available upon request.
Citations
How to Cite
Cost–effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients with diabetes and recent worsening heart failure. (2024) Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. DOI: 10.57264/cer-2023-0190
Export citation
Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.
Citing Literature
- Tristan J. Alfie, Jason H. Wasfy, Dhruv S. Kazi, James L. Januzzi, Brandon K. Bellows, Laura P. Cohen, Cost-Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors by Ejection Fraction and Drug Pricing in the United States: A Systematic Review, Circulation: Population Health and Outcomes, 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012989, (2026).
- Tazeen Tahsina, Javad Jawan, Derrick Bennett, Carl Heneghan, Benjamin J. Cairns, Odessa Hamilton, Mei Sum Chan, Rafael Perera-Salazar, Apostolos Tsiachristas, Cynthia Drakesmith, Tingting Zhu, Irene Poku, Decision Analytic Models to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Multiple Long-Term Conditions: A Scoping Review, Value in Health, 10.1016/j.jval.2025.10.010, 29, 4, (605-622), (2026).
- Ghaith K. Mansour, Sarah B. Hammo, Muhammad Raihan Sajid, Dual SGLT1/2 inhibition with sotagliflozin: a pharmaceutical breakthrough in heart failure management and cardiometabolic risk reduction, Frontiers in Medicine, 10.3389/fmed.2025.1733918, 12, (2026).
- Jason Shafrin, Shanshan Wang, Jaehong Kim, Slaven Sikirica, Economic impact of sotagliflozin among patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes: Budget impact analysis from the US payer perspective, Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.4.386, 31, 4, (386-395), (2025).
- Hong Wang, Quannan Zu, Ming Lu, Rongfa Chen, Zhangui Tang, Zhiren Yang, Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Complex Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with the Dual SGLT Inhibitor Sotagliflozin: A Meta-analysis, Diabetes Therapy, 10.1007/s13300-025-01696-w, (2025).
