Skip to main content

Abstract

Aim: Compare thrombotic risk in people with congenital hemophilia A (PwcHA) to the general non-hemophilia A (HA) population. Patients & methods: US claims databases were analyzed to identify PwcHA. Incidence rates of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis and device-related thrombosis were compared with a matched cohort without HA. Results: Over 3490 PwcHA were identified and 16,380 individuals matched. PwcHA had a similar incidence of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism compared with the non-HA population, but a slightly higher incidence of ischemic stroke and deep vein thrombosis. The incidence of device-related thrombosis was significantly higher in PwcHA. Conclusion: This analysis suggests that PwcHA are not protected against thrombosis, and provides context to evaluate thrombotic risk of HA treatments.

Supplementary Material

File (supplementary materials.docx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Past, present and future of hemophilia: a narrative review. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 7, 24 (2012).
2.
Srivastava A, Santagostino E, Dougall A et al. WFH Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia, 3rd edition. Haemophilia 26(S6), 1–158 (2020).
3.
Kamphuisen PW, ten Cate H. Cardiovascular risk in patients with hemophilia. Blood 123(9), 1297–1301 (2014).
• Summarizes important background context on risk of thrombotic events (TEs), such as myocardial infarction in people with hemophilia, speculating that their hypocoagulable state could offer protection against thrombus formation.
4.
Pocoski J, Ma A, Kessler CM, Boklage S, Humphries TJ. Cardiovascular comorbidities are increased in U.S. patients with haemophilia A: a retrospective database analysis. Haemophilia 20(4), 472–478 (2014).
•• This study of US claims data from 2007 to 2009 quantified cardiovascular comorbidities in people with hemophilia A (PwHA, n = 2506) compared with a matched non-hemophilia A (HA) population (n = 7518) and found that the former had a higher prevalence of ischemic stroke, arterial thrombosis and venous thrombosis.
5.
Tuinenburg A, Rutten A, Kavousi M et al. Coronary artery calcification in hemophilia A: no evidence for a protective effect of factor VIII deficiency on atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32(3), 799–804 (2012).
•• This population-based imaging study in The Netherlands found no evidence of a protective effect of HA against atherosclerosis.
6.
Sood SL, Cheng D, Ragni M et al. A cross-sectional analysis of cardiovascular disease in the hemophilia population. Blood Adv. 2(11), 1325–1333 (2018).
7.
Franchini M, Mannucci PM. Hemophilia A in the third millennium. Blood Rev. 27(4), 179–184 (2013).
8.
Gomez K, Klamroth R, Mahlangu J, Mancuso ME, Mingot ME, Ozelo MC. Key issues in inhibitor management in patients with haemophilia. Blood Transfus. 12(Suppl. 1), S319–S329 (2014).
9.
Shapiro AD, Mitchell IS, Nasr S. The future of bypassing agents for hemophilia with inhibitors in the era of novel agents. J. Thromb. Haemost. 16(12), 2362–2374 (2018).
10.
Spadarella G, Di Minno A, Milan G et al. Paradigm shift for the treatment of hereditary haemophilia: towards precision medicine. Blood Rev. 39, 100618 (2020).
11.
Callaghan MU, Sidonio R, Pipe SW. Novel therapeutics for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders. Blood 132(1), 23–30 (2018).
12.
Kitazawa T, Esaki K, Tachibana T et al. Factor VIIIa-mimetic cofactor activity of a bispecific antibody to factors IX/IXa and X/Xa, emicizumab, depends on its ability to bridge the antigens. Thromb. Haemost. 117(7), 1348–1357 (2017).
13.
Weyand AC, Pipe SW. New therapies for hemophilia. Blood 133(5), 389–398 (2019).
14.
Ljung R, Fischer K, Carcao M et al. Practical considerations in choosing a factor VIII prophylaxis regimen: role of clinical phenotype and trough levels. Thromb. Haemost. 115(5), 913–920 (2016).
15.
Lambert T, Benson G, Dolan G et al. Practical aspects of extended half-life products for the treatment of haemophilia. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 9(9), 295–308 (2018).
16.
Wolberg AS, Aleman MM, Leiderman K, Machlus KR. Procoagulant activity in hemostasis and thrombosis: virchow's triad revisited. Anesth. Analg. 114(2), 275–285 (2012).
• Considers the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying TEs, providing important theory behind how a hypercoagulable state and thrombotic tendency could develop if the hemostatic balance is shifted too far with therapeutic approaches to inherited hemorrhagic and thrombotic disorders.
17.
Jenkins PV, Rawley O, Smith OP, O'Donnell JS. Elevated factor VIII levels and risk of venous thrombosis. Br. J. Haematol. 157(6), 653–663 (2012).
18.
Franchini M. Thrombotic complications in patients with hereditary bleeding disorders. Thromb. Haemost. 92(08), 298–304 (2004).
19.
Ruiz-Sáez A. Thrombosis in rare bleeding disorders. Hematology 17(Suppl. 1), S156–S158 (2012).
• Describes the conditions and risk factors associated with thrombosis in PwHA.
20.
Oldenburg J, Mahlangu JN, Kim B et al. Emicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A with inhibitors. N. Engl. J. Med. 377(9), 809–818 (2017).
21.
Makris M. Thrombosis in bleeding disorders. In: The ISTH Workshop on Thrombosis and Hemostasis. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Bangkok, Thailand (2017).
22.
Biere-Rafi S, Baarslag MA, Peters M et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment in haemophilia patients. Thromb. Haemost. 105(02), 274–278 (2011).
23.
Šrámek A, Kriek M, Rosendaal FR. Decreased mortality of ischaemic heart disease among carriers of haemophilia. Lancet 362(9381), 351–354 (2003).
24.
Faghmous I, Flores C, Sarouei K et al. Estimating the risk of myocardial infarction in persons with hemophilia A using a machine-learning approach with US claims data. 61st ASH (American Society of Hematology) Annual Meeting & Exposition. https://www.cpg-medicaleducation.de/media/faghmous_ash_2019_mi_haemophilia_a_1.pdf
25.
Meyfroidt G, Güiza F, Ramon J, Bruynooghe M. Machine learning techniques to examine large patient databases. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 23(1), 127–143 (2009).
26.
Lyons J, Desai V, Xu Y et al. Development and validation of an algorithm for identifying patients with hemophilia A in an administrative claims database. Value Health 21(9), 1098–1103 (2018).
27.
Previtali E, Bucciarelli P, Passamonti SM, Martinelli I. Risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis. Blood Transfus. 9(2), 120–138 (2011).
• Summarizes risk factors for thrombosis in the general population: hyperlipidemia, smoking, diabetes, hypertension and obesity for arterial TEs; trauma or fractures, surgery, hormonal therapy, pregnancy, hypercoagulability and age for venous TEs.
28.
Ewenstein BM, Valentino LA, Journeycake JM et al. Consensus recommendations for use of central venous access devices in haemophilia. Haemophilia 10(5), 629–648 (2004).
29.
Valentino LA, Ewenstein B, Navickis RJ, Wilkes MM. Central venous access devices in haemophilia. Haemophilia 10(2), 134–146 (2004).
•• This systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with central venous access devices summarized their risk of thrombosis, due to the combination of the thrombogenic potential of the central venous access device with regular administration of clotting factor concentrates, which predisposes the site around the tip of the catheter to thrombus formation.
30.
Jaffray J, Witmer C, O'Brien SH et al. Peripherally inserted central catheters lead to a high risk of venous thromboembolism in children. Blood 135(3), 220–226 (2020).
31.
Buttigieg J, Asciak R, Azzopardi CM. Pacemaker lead-associated thrombosis in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, (2015).
32.
Chang TR, Albright KC, Boehme AK et al. Factor VIII in the setting of acute ischemic stroke among patients with suspected hypercoagulable state. Clin. App. Thromb. Hemost. 20(2), 124–128 (2014).
•• Demonstrates that high factor VIII (FVIII) levels are a risk factor for both ischemic stroke; in some settings, such as surgery, replacement therapies lead to elevated levels of FVIII in PwHA and could therefore increase risk of TEs.
33.
Kyrle PA, Minar E, Hirschl M et al. High plasma levels of factor VIII and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 343(7), 457–462 (2000).
34.
Hazendonk HCAM, van Moort I, Mathôt RAA et al. Setting the stage for individualized therapy in hemophilia: what role can pharmacokinetics play? Blood Rev. 32(4), 265–271 (2018).
35.
Timmer MA, Pisters MF, de Kleijn P, de Bie RA, Schutgens REG, Veenhof C. Movement behaviour in adults with haemophilia compared to healthy adults. Haemophillia 24(3), 445–451 (2018).
36.
Janczar S, Fogtman A, Koblowska M et al. Novel severe hemophilia A and moyamoya (SHAM) syndrome caused by Xq28 deletions encompassing F8 and BRCC3 genes. Blood 123(25), 4002–4004 (2014).
37.
Miskinyte S, Butler MG, Hervé D et al. Loss of BRCC3 deubiquitinating enzyme leads to abnormal angiogenesis and is associated with syndromic moyamoya. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88(6), 718–728 (2011).
38.
Roh D, Roth W, Al-Mufti F et al. The utility of factor VIII infusion in a rare case of SHAM Syndrome (P4.343). Neurology 86(Suppl. 16), P4.343 (2016).
39.
Martin K, Key NS. How I treat patients with inherited bleeding disorders who need anticoagulant therapy. Blood 128(2), 178–184 (2016).
40.
Makris M, Iorio A, Lenting PJ. Emicizumab and thrombosis: the story so far. J. Thromb. Haemost. 17(8), 1269–1272 (2019).
41.
Tyree PT, Lind BK, Lafferty WE. Challenges of using medical insurance claims data for utilization analysis. Am. J. Med. Qual. 21(4), 269–275 (2006).
42.
Kurian AK, Cardarelli KM. Racial and ethnic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review. Ethn. Dis. 17(1), 143–152 (2007).
43.
White RH, Keenan CR. Effects of race and ethnicity on the incidence of venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Res. 123(Suppl. 4), S11–S17 (2009).