Clinical outcomes of retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolic diseases
Publication: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Abstract
Aim: To identify literature evidence assessing retrievable inferior vena cava filter (rIVCF) for venous thromboembolic diseases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant references from the mainstay English and Chinese bibliographic databases (search period: January 2003 to October 2019). Results: 80 original studies with 11,413 patients were included in this review. The success rates of deploying the six types of rIVCFs ranged from 98.4 to 100.0%. Denali had the highest retrieval success rate (95.4–97.6%). The incidence rates of fracture and perforation associated with retrieving the six rIVCFs were less than 2%. Conclusion: The approved rIVCF had comparable clinical profiles, except that Denali was easier to be retrieved than other rIVCF.
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2(2), 200–212 (2006).
2.
Young T, Tang H, Hughes R. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD006212 (2010).
3.
Greenfield LJ. The PREPIC study group. Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Perspect. Vasc. Surg. Endovasc. Ther. 18(2), 187–188 (2006).
4.
Kaufman JA, Kinney TB, Streiff MB et al. Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2(2), 200–212 (2006).
5.
Ghatan CE, Ryu RK. Permanent versus retrievable inferior vena cava filters: rethinking the “one-filter-for-all” approach to mechanical thromboembolic prophylaxis. Semin. Intervent. Radiol. 33(2), 75–78 (2016).
6.
Al-Hakim R, Kee ST, Olinger K, Lee EW, Moriarty JM, McWilliams JP. Inferior vena cava filter retrieval: effectiveness and complications of routine and advanced techniques. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 25(6), 933–940 (2014).
7.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 17(1), 1–12 (1996).
8.
Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell PJ. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canada, 1–2 (2011).
9.
Efthimiou O. Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events. Evid. Based Ment. Health 21(2), 72–76 (2018).
10.
Carrafiello G, Mangini M, Fontana F et al. Suprarenal inferior vena cava filter implantation. Radiol. Med. 117(7), 1190–1198 (2012).
11.
Caronno R, Piffaretti G, Tozzi M et al. Mid-term experience with the ALN retrievable inferior vena cava filter. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 32(5), 596–599 (2006).
12.
Imberti D, Bianchi M, Farina A, Siragusa S, Silingardi M, Ageno W. Clinical experience with retrievable vena cava filters: results of a prospective observational multicenter study. J. Thromb. Haemost. 3(7), 1370–1375 (2005).
13.
Laganà D, Carrafiello G, Lumia D et al. Removable vena cava filter: single-centre experience with a single device. Radiol. Med. 118(5), 816–825 (2013).
14.
Mismetti P, Rivron-Guillot K, Quenet S et al. A prospective long-term study of 220 patients with a retrievable vena cava filter for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Chest 131(1), 223–229 (2007).
15.
Mismetti P, Laporte S, Pellerin O et al. Effect of a retrievable inferior vena cava filter plus anticoagulation vs anticoagulation alone on risk of recurrent pulmonary embolism: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 313(16), 1627–1635 (2015).
16.
Pellerin O, di Primio M, Sanchez O, Meyer G, Sapoval M. Successful retrieval of 29 ALN inferior vena cava filters at a mean of 25.6 months after placement. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 24(2), 284–288 (2013).
17.
Koizumi J, Hara T, Sekiguchi T et al. Multicenter investigation of the incidence of inferior vena cava filter fracture. Jpn J. Radiol. 36(11), 661–668 (2018).
18.
Lee MJ, Valenti D, de Gregorio MA, Minocha J, Rimon U, Pellerin O. The CIRSE Retrievable IVC Filter Registry: Retrieval Success Rates in Practice. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 38(6), 1502–1507 (2015).
19.
Dowell JD, Wagner D, Elliott E, Yildiz VO, Pan X. Factors associated with advanced inferior vena cava filter removals: a single-center retrospective study of 203 patients over 7 years. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 39(2), 218–226 (2016).
20.
Bos A, Van Ha T, van Beek D et al. Strut penetration: local complications, breakthrough pulmonary embolism, and retrieval failure in patients with Celect vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 26(1), 101–106 (2015).
21.
Doody O, Given MF, Kavnoudias H, Street M, Thomson KR, Lyon SM. Initial experience in 115 patients with the retrievable Cook Celect vena cava filter. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 53(1), 64–68 (2009).
22.
Jinglei DU, Shiping YU, Xiuqin SU et al. The recyclability and safety of Celect retrievable vena cava filter. Chin. J. Radiol. 52(2), 135–139 (2018).
23.
Lyon SM, Riojas GE, Uberoi R et al. Short- and long-term retrievability of the Celect vena cava filter: results from a multi-institutional registry. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20(11), 1441–1448 (2009).
24.
Sangwaiya MJ, Marentis TC, Walker TG, Stecker M, Wicky ST, Kalva SP. Safety and effectiveness of the celect inferior vena cava filter: preliminary results. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20(9), 1188–1192 (2009).
25.
Zhou D, Spain J, Moon E, Mclennan G, Sands MJ, Wang W. Retrospective review of 120 celect inferior vena cava filter retrievals: experience at a single institution. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 23(12), 1557–1563 (2012).
26.
Rajasekhar A, Lottenberg L, Lottenberg R et al. A pilot study on the randomization of inferior vena cava filter placement for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in high-risk trauma patients. J. Trauma 71(2), 323–329 (2011).
27.
Tian X, Liu JL, Jia W. Clinical application of Celect retrievable filters for fracture combined with deep venous thrombosis. Chin. J. Vasc. Surg. 4, 230–234 (2014).
28.
Zhao BX, Gu JP, He X. The safety and effectiveness of Celect inferior vena cava filter evaluated by CT. Chin. J. Radiol. 8, 619–623 (2018).
29.
Rosenthal D, Kochupura PV, Wellons ED, Burkett AB, Methodius-Rayford WC. Günther Tulip and Celect IVC filters in multiple-trauma patients. J. Endovasc. Ther. 16(4), 494–499 (2009).
30.
Dowell JD, Castle JC, Schickel M et al. Celect inferior vena cava wall strut perforation begets additional strut perforation. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 26(10), 1510–1518 (2015).
31.
Dowell JD, Castle JC, Spinner J, Black S. Role of inferior vena cava filters in transplant patients. Clin. Transplant. 31(2), e12865 (2017).
32.
Jiang P, Cheng ZY, Li JY. Effect of indwelling time of Celect filter on inferior vena cava penetration. Shandong Med. J. 20, 100–102 (2018).
33.
Lee BE, Van Allan RJ, Friedman ML, Lipshutz HG. Complications and retrieval characteristics of Celect Platinum inferior vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 6(2), 163–172 (2018).
34.
Lee SY, Lee J. Is external compression on the IVC a risk factor for IVC filter abutment? A single center experience of 141 infrarenal celect filter insertions. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 5, 73–78 (2018).
35.
Son J, Bae M, Chung SW, Lee CW, Huh U, Song S. Should we remove the retrievable cook celect inferior vena cava filter? Eight years of experience at a single center. Korean J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 50(6), 443–447 (2017).
36.
Wang W, Zhou D, Obuchowski N, Spain J, An T, Moon E. Fracture and migration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective review of 741 consecutive implantations. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 24(11), 1719–1722 (2013).
37.
Zhou D, Moon E, Bullen J, Sands M, Levitin A, Wang W. Penetration of Celect inferior vena cava filters: retrospective review of CT scans in 265 patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 202(3), 643–647 (2014).
38.
Swami U, Annunziata G, Fulger I. Experience with vena cava filters at a large community hospital and level-I trauma center: indications, complications, and compliance barriers. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 20(5), 546–552 (2014).
39.
Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S et al. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 35(2), 299–308 (2012).
40.
Go MR, Keller-Biehl L, Starr JE. Penetration of the inferior vena cava and adjacent organs after filter placement is associated with retrievable filter type and length of time in place. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2(2), 174–178 (2014).
41.
McLoney ED, Krishnasamy VP, Castle JC, Yang X, Guy G. Complications of Celect, Günther tulip, and Greenfield inferior vena cava filters on CT follow-up: a single-institution experience. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 24(11), 1723–1729 (2013).
42.
Laborda A, Kuo WT, Ioakeim I et al. Respiratory-induced haemodynamic changes: a contributing factor to IVC filter penetration. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 38(5), 1192–1197 (2015).
43.
Ryu RK, Desai K, Karp J et al. A comparison of retrievability: Celect versus Option Filter. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 26(6), 865–869 (2015).
44.
Bos AS, Tullius T, Patel M et al. Indwelling and retrieval complications of Denali and Celect infrarenal vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 27(7), 1021–1026 (2016).
•• This is a control study comparing two rIVCF.
45.
Bae JH, Lee SY. Filter tilting and retrievability of the Celect and Denali inferior vena cava filters using propensity score-matching analysis. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 5, 153–158 (2018).
• This study reported adjusted comparisons of the outcomes between two rIVCF.
46.
Smouse HB, Mendes R, Bosiers M, Van Ha TG, Crabtree T. RETRIEVE Investigators. The RETRIEVE trial: safety and effectiveness of the retrievable crux vena cava filter. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 24(5), 609–621 (2013).
• Reported both safety and effectiveness of retrievable inferior vena cava filter (rIVCF).
47.
Choi SJ, Lee SY, Ryeom HK et al. Femoral versus jugular access for Denali Vena Cava Filter placement: analysis of fluoroscopic time, filter tilt and retrieval outcomes. Clin. Imaging 52, 337–342 (2018).
48.
Reis SP, Kovoor J, Sutphin PD et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Denali Inferior vena cava filter: intermediate follow-up results. Vasc. Endovascular Surg. 50(6), 385–390 (2016).
• Reported both effectiveness and safety of Denali.
49.
Stavropoulos SW, Chen JX, Sing RF et al. Analysis of the final DENALI trial data: a prospective, multicenter study of the denali inferior vena cava filter. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 27(10), 1531–1538 (2016).
• The prospective multicenter design and large sample size made the real-world evidence in this study more reliable and valid.
50.
Han K, Kim MD, Kim GM et al. Comparison of retrievability and indwelling complications of Celect and Denali infrarenal vena cava filters: a randomized, controlled trial. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 44(10), 1536–1542 (2021).
•• This study was a randomized control trial.
51.
Dowell JD, Semaan D, Makary MS, Ryu J, Khayat M, Pan X. Retrieval characteristics of the Bard Denali and Argon Option inferior vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 5(6), 800–804 (2017).
52.
Xie MY, Wang XG. Application of retrievable vena cava filter in patients with lower limb fractures complicated with deep venous thrombosis. Chin. J. Bases Clinics Gen. Surg. 26(3), 312–314 (2019).
53.
Ramaswamy RS, Jun E, van Beek D et al. Denali, Tulip, and Option inferior vena cava filter retrieval: a single center experience. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 41(4), 572–577 (2018).
54.
Chen GP, Gu JP, He X. Clinical application of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cavu filter. J. Med. Imaging 15, 867–869 (2005).
55.
de Gregorio MA, Gamboa P, Gimeno MJ et al. The Günther Tulip retrievable filter: prolonged temporary filtration by repositioning within the inferior vena cava. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 14(10), 1259–1265 (2003).
56.
De Gregorio MA, Gamboa P, Bonilla DL et al. Retrieval of Gunther Tulip optional vena cava filters 30 days after implantation: a prospective clinical study. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17(11 Pt 1), 1781–1789 (2006).
57.
Ge B, Liu P. Inferior vena cava filter placement for prevention of pulmonary embolism: a report of 57 cases. Orthopedic J. Chin. 6, 1049–1050 (2012).
58.
Hoffer EK, Mueller RJ, Luciano MR, Lee NN, Michaels AT, Gemery JM. Safety and efficacy of the Gunther Tulip retrievable vena cava filter: midterm outcomes. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 36(4), 998–1005 (2013).
59.
Hong D, Zhang XT. Comparison on the value of OptEase filter and Tulip filter in endovascular therapy of deep venous thrombosis. Chinese J. Interv. Imaging Ther. 8(3), 193–196 (2011).
60.
Hoppe H, Nutting CW, Smouse HR et al. Günther Tulip filter retrievability multicenter study including CT follow-up: final report. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17(6), 1017–1023 (2006).
61.
Kaskarelis IS, Koukoulaki M, Chlapoutaki CE et al. Clinical experience with Günther temporary inferior vena cava filters. Clin. Imaging 30(2), 108–113 (2006).
62.
Keller IS, Meier C, Pfiffner R, Keller E, Pfammatter T. Clinical comparison of two optional vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 18(4), 505–511 (2007).
63.
Looby S, Given MF, Geoghegan T, McErlean A, Lee MJ. Gunther Tulip retrievable inferior vena caval filters: indications, efficacy, retrieval, and complications. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 30(1), 59–65 (2007).
64.
Offner PJ, Hawkes A, Madayag R, Seale F, Maines C. The role of temporary inferior vena cava filters in critically ill surgical patients. Arch. Surg. 138(6), 591–595 (2003).
65.
Ota S, Yamada N, Tsuji A et al. The Günther-Tulip retrievable IVC filter: clinical experience in 118 consecutive patients. Circ. J. 72(2), 287–292 (2008).
66.
Piano G, Ketteler ER, Prachand V et al. Safety, feasibility, and outcome of retrievable vena cava filters in high-risk surgical patients. J. Vasc. Surg. 45(4), 784–788 (2007).
67.
Rosenthal D, Wellons ED, Hancock SM, Burkett AB. Retrievability of the Günther Tulip vena cava filter after dwell times longer than 180 days in patients with multiple trauma. J. Endovasc. Ther. 14(3), 406–410 (2007).
68.
Schuster R, Hagedorn JC, Curet MJ, Morton JM. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters may be safely applied in gastric bypass surgery. Surg. Endosc. 21(12), 2277–2279 (2007).
69.
Strauss EJ, Egol KA, Alaia M, Hansen D, Bashar M, Steiger D. The use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in orthopaedic patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 90(5), 662–667 (2008).
70.
Terhaar OA, Lyon SM, Given MF, Foster AE, Mc Grath F, Lee MJ. Extended interval for retrieval of Günther Tulip filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 15(11), 1257–1262 (2004).
71.
Xiao L, Xu K, Shen J, Li H, Tong J, Zhang X. The application of GxA8xB9nther Tulip retrievable inferior vena cava filter in interventional treatment for acute deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity. J. Interv. Radiol. 19(9), 707–711 (2010).
72.
Xiao L, Shen J, Tong J, Li H, Xu K. The initial experience of transjugular retrieval of Geunther Tulip inferior vena cava filters. J. Interv. Radiol. 20(5), 366–371 (2011).
73.
Yamagami T, Kato T, Iida S, Hirota T, Nishimura T. Gunther tulip inferior vena cava filter placement during treatment for deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 28(4), 442–453 (2005).
74.
Yamagami T, Kato T, Hirota T, Yoshimatsu R, Matsumoto T, Nishimura T. Evaluation of retrievability of the Gunther tulip vena cava filter. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 30(2), 226–231 (2007).
75.
Geisbüsch P, Benenati JF, Peña CS et al. Retrievable inferior vena cava filters: factors that affect retrieval success. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 35(5), 1059–1065 (2012).
76.
Wicky S, Doenz F, Meuwly JY, Portier F, Schnyder P, Denys A. Clinical experience with retrievable Günther Tulip vena cava filters. J. Endovasc. Ther. 10(5), 994–1000 (2003).
77.
Given MF, McDonald BC, Brookfield P et al. Retrievable Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 317 patients. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 52(5), 452–457 (2008).
78.
Hiromatsu S, Nata S, Ohno T et al. Non-permanent inferior vena cava filters for prophylaxis and treatment of lower limb venous thromboembolism. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 44(8), 668–673 (2010).
79.
Ray CE Jr, Mitchell E, Zipser S, Kao EY, Brown CF, Moneta GL. Outcomes with retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a multicenter study. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17(10), 1595–1604 (2006).
80.
Seshadri T, Tran H, Lau KK, Tan B, Gan TE. Ins and outs of inferior vena cava filters in patients with venous thromboembolism: the experience at Monash Medical Centre and review of the published reports. Intern. Med. J. 38(1), 38–43 (2008).
81.
Smouse HB, Rosenthal D, Thuong VH et al. Long-term retrieval success rate profile for the Günther Tulip vena cava filter. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 20(7), 871–878 (2009).
82.
Gasparis AP, Spentzouris G, Meisner RJ, Elitharp D, Labropoulos N, Tassiopoulos A. Improving retrieval rates of temporary inferior vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Surg. 54(Suppl. 6), S34–S38 (2011).
83.
Karmy-Jones R, Jurkovich GJ, Velmahos GC et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of retrievable vena cava filters in trauma patients: an AAST multicenter study. J. Trauma 62(1), 17–25 (2007).
84.
Sag AA, Stavas JM, Burke CT, Dixon RG, Marquess JS, Mauro MA. Analysis of tilt of the Günther Tulip filter. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 19(5), 669–676 (2008).
85.
Turba UC, Arslan B, Meuse M et al. Günter tulip filter retrieval experience: predictors of successful retrieval. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 33(4), 732–738 (2010).
86.
Olorunsola OG, Kohi MP, Fidelman N et al. Caval penetration by retrievable inferior vena cava filters: a retrospective comparison of Option and Günther Tulip filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 24(4), 566–571 (2013).
87.
Johnson MS, Nemcek AA Jr, Benenati JF et al. The safety and effectiveness of the retrievable option inferior vena cava filter: a United States prospective multicenter clinical study. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 21(8), 1173–1184 (2010).
88.
Iqbal SI, Elmi A, Hedgire S et al. Preliminary experience with Option inferior vena cava filter. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 47(1), 24–29 (2013).
89.
Tsui B, An T, Moon E, King R, Wang W. Retrospective review of 516 implantations of Option inferior vena cava filters at a single health care system. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 27(3), 345–353 (2016).
90.
Soleymanha M, Mobayen M, Asadi K, Adeli A, Haghparast-Ghadim-Limudahi Z. Survey of 2582 cases of acute orthopedic trauma. Trauma Mon. 19(4), e16215 (2014).
91.
Wall PL, Glawe BJ, Sahr SM et al. Gender differences in blood transfusions after trauma related to ages and mechanisms. Am. Surg. 80(5), E141–E143 (2014).
92.
Roach RE, Cannegieter SC, Lijfering WM. Differential risks in men and women for first and recurrent venous thrombosis: the role of genes and environment. J. Thromb. Haemost. 12(10), 1593–1600 (2014).
93.
Bard Denali Vena Cava Filter Instructions for Use [package insert]. Bard Peripheral Vascular, AZ, USA (2013). Revision 4
94.
Singer MA, Wang SL. Modeling blood flow in a tilted inferior vena cava filter: does tilt adversely affect hemodynamics? J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 22(2), 229–235 (2011).
95.
Option™ELITE Inferior Vena Cava Filter System. (2020). https://www.argonmedical.com/products/option-elite-inferior-vena-cava-filter-system
96.
Murphy EH, Johnson ED, Kopchok GE, Fogarty TJ, Arko FR. Crux vena cava filter. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 6(5), 477–485 (2009).
97.
Durack JC, Westphalen AC, Kekulawela S et al. Perforation of the IVC: rule rather than exception after longer indwelling times for the Günther Tulip and Celect retrievable filters. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 35(2), 299–308 (2012).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pages: 437 - 449
PubMed: 35199584
Copyright
© 2022 Future Medicine Ltd.
History
Received: 22 November 2021
Accepted: 5 February 2022
Published online: 24 February 2022
Keywords:
Topics
Authors
Funding Information
BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company)
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Article usage data only available from February 2023. Historical article usage data, showing the number of article downloads, is available upon request.
Citations
How to Cite
Clinical outcomes of retrievable inferior vena cava filters for venous thromboembolic diseases. (2022) Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0291
Export citation
Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.
Citing Literature
- Pengkai Cao, Xintong Luo, Yunsong Li, Xiang Gao, Xiangdong Liu, Yanrong Zhang, Wei Bi, Anticoagulation Therapy May Reduce Subsegmental Nonocclusive Inferior Vena Cava Filter–Related Thrombus Burden: A Retrospective Study in a Single-Center Institution, Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 10.1177/15266028251384946, (2025).
- Xuan Tian, Jianlong Liu, Jinyong Li, Xiao Liu, Mi Zhou, Yule Tian, Case Report: Endoluminal removal of a conical retrievable superior vena cava filter with a retraction hook attached to the wall, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1412571, 11, (2024).
- Miguel Angel De Gregorio, Juan Jose Ciampi-Dopazo, Jose Urbano, Roman Bernal, Carolina Serrano-Casorrán, Cristina Bonastre, Jose Maria Abadal, Santiago Mendez, Arturo Fredes, Jose Rodriguez, Sergio Rodriguez, Jose Andres Guirola, Effectiveness, Retrievability, and Safety of Celect vs. ALN Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Randomized Prospective Multicenter Controlled Study, Journal of Vascular Diseases, 10.3390/jvd2010012, 2, 1, (177-187), (2023).