Skip to main content
Search
Search
Advanced Search
Skip main navigation
Free access
Research Article
22 June 2021

Gender, socioeconomic status and emergency department visits among cancer survivors in the USA: a population-based study

Author: Omar Abdel-Rahman https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-2502 [email protected]Author Info & Affiliations
Volume 10, Number 12
https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0278
PDFFormats

Abstract

Aim: To assess patterns of emergency department visits and subsequent hospitalization in relation to gender and socioeconomic status among a cohort of cancer survivors in the USA. Materials & methods: National Health Interview Survey datasets (2011–2017) were reviewed and participants with a history of cancer and complete information about emergency department visits in the past 12 months were included. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with emergency department visits and subsequent hospitalization after the most recent emergency department visit. Results: A total of 22,240 cancer survivors were included in the current analysis; of which 16,133 participants (72.5%) who have not visited an emergency department in the past 12 months and 6107 participants (27.5%) who have visited an emergency department in the past 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested the following factors are associated with emergency department visits; younger age (odds ratio [OR] with increasing age: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98–0.99), female gender (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00–1.15), African American race (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.13–1.40), unmarried status (OR for married vs unmarried: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74–0.84), lower yearly earnings (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.20–1.54), poor health status (OR: 7.02; 95% CI: 6.02–8.18) and incomplete health insurance coverage (OR for complete coverage vs incomplete coverage: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.54–0.80). On the other hand, the following factors were associated with subsequent hospitalization: older age (OR: 1.004; 95% CI: 1.000–1.008), male gender (OR for female vs male: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.78–0.94), unmarried status (OR for married vs unmarried status: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.73–0.88), not working (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.23–1.68), lower yearly earnings (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.07–1.60), poor health status (OR: 8.43; 95% CI: 6.76–10.51) and lack of health insurance coverage (OR for complete coverage vs incomplete coverage: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55–0.93). Conclusion: Female cancer survivors were more likely to visit the emergency department, whereas they were less likely to be subsequently hospitalized. Cancer survivors with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to visit emergency departments and to be subsequently hospitalized.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

View PDFView Full Text

References

1.
Barbera L, Taylor C, Dudgeon D. Why do patients with cancer visit the emergency department near the end of life? CMAJ 182(6), 563–568 (2010).
PubMed
Google Scholar
2.
Alsirafy SA, Raheem AA, Al-Zahrani AS et al. Emergency department visits at the end of life of patients with terminal cancer: pattern, causes, and avoidability. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Care 33(7), 658–662 (2016).
PubMed
Google Scholar
3.
Prince RM, Powis M, Zer A, Atenafu EG, Krzyzanowska MK. Hospitalisations and emergency department visits in cancer patients receiving systemic therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer Care 28(1), e12909 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
4.
Abdel-Rahman O. Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 168(1), 269–275 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
5.
Zahedi A, Bondaz L, Rajaraman M et al. Risk for thyroid cancer recurrence is higher in men than in women independent of disease stage at presentation. Thyroid 30(6), 871–877 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
6.
Hernando-Cubero J, Grande E, Castellano DE et al. Impact of gender on multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) toxicity in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): a pooled analysis of two Phase II trials with pazopanib and lenvatinib. J. Clin. Oncol. 37(Suppl. 15), 4109–4109 (2019).
Google Scholar
7.
Kuhlthau KA, Nipp RD, Shui A et al. Health insurance coverage, care accessibility and affordability for adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional study of a nationally representative database. J. Cancer Surviv. 10(6), 964–971 (2016).
PubMed
Google Scholar
8.
Nipp RD, Shui AM, Perez GK et al. Patterns in health care access and affordability among cancer survivors during implementation of the affordable care act. JAMA Oncol. 4(6), 791–797 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
9.
Zheng Z, Han X, Zhao J et al. Financial hardship, healthcare utilization, and health among U.S. cancer survivors. Am. J. Prev. Med. 59(1), 68–78 (2020).
PubMed
Google Scholar
10.
Eskander A, Krzyzanowska MK, Fischer HD et al. Emergency department visits and unplanned hospitalizations in the treatment period for head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent: a population-based analysis. Oral Oncol. 83, 107–114 (2018).
PubMed
Google Scholar
11.
Tang PL, Chang HT, Cheng CC et al. An analysis of emergency department visits and the survival rate for colorectal cancer patients: a Nationwide Population-Based study. Intern. Med. 56(16), 2125–2132 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
14.
Sloan C, Chandrasekhar R, Mitchel E, Schaffner W, Lindegren ML. Socioeconomic disparities and influenza hospitalizations, Tennessee, USA. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21(9), 1602–1610 (2015).
PubMed
Google Scholar
15.
Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ 316(7139), 1236–1238 (1998).
PubMed
Google Scholar
16.
Abdel-Rahman O. Socioeconomic predictors of suicide risk among cancer patients in the United States: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 63, 101601 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
17.
Abdel-Rahman O. Outcomes of nonmetastatic colon cancer patients in relationship to socioeconomic status: an analysis of SEER census tract-level socioeconomic database. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 24(12), 1582–1587 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
18.
Abdel-Rahman O. Impact of NCI socioeconomic index on the outcomes of nonmetastatic breast cancer patients: analysis of SEER census tract-level socioeconomic database. Clin. Breast Cancer 19(6), e717–e722 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
19.
Zheng Z, Jemal A, Banegas MP, Han X, Yabroff KR. High-deductible health plans and cancer survivorship: what is the association with access to care and hospital emergency department use? J. Oncol. Pract. 15(11), e957–e968 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
20.
De Boer AGEM, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MHW, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015(9), CD007569 (2015).
PubMed
Google Scholar
21.
Piccinelli M, Simon G. Gender and cross-cultural differences in somatic symptoms associated with emotional distress. An international study in primary care. Psychol. Med. 27(2), 433–444 (1997).
PubMed
Google Scholar
22.
Gold CH, Malmberg B, Mcclearn GE, Pedersen NL, Berg S. Gender and health: a study of older unlike-sex twins. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 57(3), S168–S176 (2002).
PubMed
Google Scholar
23.
Wang Y, Hunt K, Nazareth I, Freemantle N, Petersen I. Do men consult less than women? An analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data. BMJ Open 3(8), e003320 (2013).
PubMed
Google Scholar
24.
Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL. Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366(9488), 825–831 (2005).
PubMed
Google Scholar
25.
Abdel-Rahman O. Impact of sex on chemotherapy toxicity and efficacy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of 5 randomized trials. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 18(2), 110–115.e112 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
26.
Ferry AV, Anand A, Strachan FE et al. Presenting symptoms in men and women diagnosed with myocardial infarction using sex-specific criteria. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8(17), e012307 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
27.
Keteepe-Arachi T, Sharma S. Preventing stroke and assessing risk in women. Practitioner 261(1802), 13–17 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
28.
Gushue C, Miller R, Sheikh S et al. Gaps in health insurance coverage and emergency department use among children with asthma. J. Asthma 56(10), 1070–1078 (2019).
PubMed
Google Scholar
29.
Cooper WO, Arbogast PG, Hickson GB, Daugherty JR, Ray WA. Gaps in enrollment from a Medicaid managed care program: effects on emergency department visits and hospitalizations for children with asthma. Med. Care 43(7), 718–725 (2005).
PubMed
Google Scholar
30.
Cooper GS, Kou TD, Dor A, Koroukian SM, Schluchter MD. Cancer preventive services, socioeconomic status, and the affordable care act. Cancer 123(9), 1585–1589 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
31.
Letourneau JM, Smith JF, Ebbel EE et al. Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer. Cancer 118(18), 4579–4588 (2012).
PubMed
Google Scholar
32.
Bor J, Cohen GH, Galea S. Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980–2015. Lancet 389(10077), 1475–1490 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
33.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Consequences of Uninsurance. Hidden costs, values lost: uninsurance in America. In: Spending on Health Care for Uninsured Americans: How Much, and Who Pays? National Academies Press, DC, USA (2003).
Google Scholar
34.
Abdel-Rahman O. Risk of cardiac death among cancer survivors in the United States: a SEER database analysis. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 17(9), 873–878 (2017).
PubMed
Google Scholar
|