Skip to main content
Free access
Editorial
27 September 2019

Improving the quality of economic evaluation in health in low- and middle-income countries: where are we now?

First page of PDF

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

1.
Pitt C, Goodman C, Hanson K. Economic evaluation in global perspective: a bibliometric analysis of the recent literature. Health Econ. 25, 9–28 (2016).
2.
Griffiths UK, Legood R, Pitt C. Comparison of economic evaluation methods across low-income, middle-income and high-income countries: what are the differences and why? Health Econ. 25, 29–41 (2016).
3.
Wilkinson T, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K et al. The International Decision Support Initiative reference case for economic evaluation: an aid to thought. Value Health 19(8), 921–928 (2016).
4.
Emerson J, Panzer A, Cohen JT et al. Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies. PLoS ONE 14(5), e0205633 (2019).
5.
GEAR. Guidelines comparison: what can I learn from the existing health economic evaluation guidelines? (2019). http://www.gear4health.com/gear/health-economic-evaluation-guidelines
6.
Robinson LA, Hammitt JK, Jamison DT, Walker DG. Conducting benefit-cost analysis in low- and middle-income countries: introduction to the special issue. J. Benefit Cost Anal. 10(S1), 1–14 (2019).
7.
Athey S, Imbens G. Machine learning methods economists should know about (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.10075
8.
Devlin NJ, Appleby J, Buxton M et al. Getting the most out of PROMs: health outcomes and NHS decision-making (2010). https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/getting-most-out-proms