Skip to main content
Open access
Research Article
18 July 2025

Mapping Dermatology Life Quality Index with EQ-5D health utility index score in Chinese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis

Abstract

Aim: To establish correlation between Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) utility score in Chinese moderate-to severe psoriasis patients and develop mapping models for health utility prediction. Materials & methods: A total of 287 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and at least one clinical visit with assessments for both DLQI and EQ-5D in a Chinese tertiary hospital were included. These patients were randomly split into a training set (n = 231) and a testing set (n = 56). Correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationship between DLQI (total score and item score) and EQ-5D utility index score. Twelve predictive models were developed using three statistical model approaches (ordinary least squares model, Tobit model and generalized linear model), incorporating various combinations of DLQI scores and patient characteristics (age, sex, education and comorbidities). Models were evaluated using root mean square error and mean absolute error (MAE). Results: A strong and significant correlation was found between DLQI total score and EQ-5D utility index score (r = -0.645, p < 0.001). The best-performing model, (ordinary least squares model using DLQI total score, had the lowest root mean square error (0.122) and MAE (0.076). Validation of this model in the testing set yielded a predicted utility score with an MAE of 0.072, and an MAE-to-utility ratio of 0.084, below the validation threshold of 0.1. Conclusion: DLQI scores can reliably predict health utility values, offering a useful tool for clinical decision-making and health economic evaluations. The model shows strong predictive accuracy and has potential applications in the management of msPsO in China.

Plain language summary: Understanding the relationship between skin-specific & general health measures in Chinese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis (msPsO)

What is this article about?

This study focuses on exploring the relationship between a skin-specific quality-of-life measure, called the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and health utility, which indicates overall well-being and often measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, in Chinese patients with msPsO. By using this relationship, future studies can directly convert DLQI score to health utilities that are commonly needed to assess the cost–effectiveness of psoriasis treatments.

What were the results?

A strong link between DLQI scores and health utility was confirmed in Chinese patients with msPsO. Among the tested prediction models, ordinary least squares model had the best performance by only using DLQI total score to predict health utility.

What do the results mean?

Since DLQI has been routinely used to assess psoriasis in clinical practices, the developed prediction model from this study will allow future research to easily estimate health utility and fill the current evidence gap for health utility in Chinese patients with msPsO.

Shareable abstract

This study maps the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) to EQ-5D utility index scores in Chinese patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. A strong negative correlation (r = -0.645, p < 0.001) was found between DLQI total score and EQ utility index score. The best-performing model, an ordinary least squares model only using DLQI total score as the predictor, had the highest predictive accuracy (root mean square error: 0.122, mean absolute error: 0.076) among the tested models. The validation analysis confirmed that this developed predictive model offers a reliable tool to bridge the gap between dermatology-specific and generic quality-of-life measures.

Supplementary Material

File (supplementary materials.docx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Raharja A, Mahil SK, Barker JN. Psoriasis: a brief overview. Clin. Med. (Lond) 21, 170–173 (2021).
2.
Armstrong AW, Read C. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of psoriasis: a review. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 323, 1945–1960 (2020).
3.
Mazzotti E, Barbaranelli C, Picardi A, Abeni D, Pasquini P. Psychometric properties of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in 900 Italian patients with psoriasis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 85, 409–413 (2005).
4.
Hjortsberg C, Bergman A, Bjarnason A et al. Are treatment satisfaction, quality of life, and self-assessed disease severity relevant parameters for patient registries? Experiences from Finnish and Swedish patients with psoriasis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 91, 409–414 (2011).
• Analyzes the correlation between Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and EuroQol 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) in European patients with psoriasis, supporting the theoretical basis for cross-instrument mapping; however, the sample does not represent the Chinese population.
5.
Herédi E, Rencz F, Balogh O et al. Exploring the relationship between EQ-5D, DLQI and PASI, and mapping EQ-5D utilities: a cross-sectional study in psoriasis from Hungary. Eur. J. Health Econ. 15(Suppl. 1), S111–S119 (2014).
•• Develops a mapping model from DLQI to EQ-5D in Hungarian patients with psoriasis. Its methodology directly supports our research and provides a precedent for cross-cultural mapping.
6.
Davison NJ, Thompson AJ, Turner AJ et al. Generating EQ-5D-3L utility scores from the Dermatology Life Quality Index: a mapping study in patients with psoriasis. Value Health 21, 1010–1018 (2018).
•• Directly investigates the mapping of DLQI to EQ-5D-3L utility values, demonstrating the feasibility of such mapping and providing a methodological reference for our research.
7.
Norlin JM, Steen Carlsson K, Persson U, Schmitt-Egenolf M. Analysis of three outcome measures in moderate to severe psoriasis: a registry-based study of 2450 patients. Br. J. Dermatol. 166, 797–802 (2012).
8.
Ali FM, Kay R, Finlay AY et al. Mapping of the DLQI scores to EQ-5D utility values using ordinal logistic regression. Qual. Life Res. 26, 3025–3034 (2017).
•• Employs ordinal logistic regression to map DLQI to EQ-5D, demonstrating methodological innovation and supporting the model selection in our research.
9.
Committee of Psoriasis DB, Chinese Medical Association. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of psoriasis in China: 2019 concise edition#. Int. J. Dermatol. Venereol. 3, 14–26 (2020).
•• The inclusion criteria for moderate-to-severe psoriasis, such as PASI ≥ 3, defined in the Chinese Psoriasis Guidelines, provide an authoritative basis for the classification of the study population.
10.
Luo N, Liu G, Li M, Guan H, Jin X, Rand-Hendriksen K. Estimating an EQ-5D-5L value set for China. Value Health 20, 662–669 (2017).
•• Establishes the Chinese EQ-5D-5L value set, providing a fundamental basis for utility index conversion in our research and directly influencing the local validity of the results.
11.
Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co (1996).
12.
Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) –a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 19, 210–216 (1994).
13.
Esposti LD, Perrone V, Sangiorgi D et al. Analysis of drug utilization and health care resource consumption in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis before and after treatment with biological therapies. Biologics 12, 151–158 (2018).
14.
Raho G, Koleva DM, Garattini L, Naldi L. The burden of moderate to severe psoriasis: an overview. Pharmacoeconomics 30, 1005–1013 (2012).
15.
Chen W, Zhang L, Hu M, Hu S. Use of health technology assessment in drug reimbursement decisions in China. Brit. Med. J. 381, e068915 (2023).
• Explores the application of health technology assessment in drug reimbursement in China, highlighting the potential implications of our research findings for health economic policy.
16.
Huang C, Ung COL, Wushouer H et al. Health technology assessment-informed pricing negotiation in China: higher negotiated price for more effective targeted anticancer medicines? Health Res. Policy Syst. 20, 1–7 (2022).