Patterns of emergency department visits preceding colorectal cancer diagnosis: a population-based study
Publication: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Abstract
Aim: To assess the patterns of emergency department (ED) visits in the 3 months preceding a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a real-world, population-based context. Materials & methods: Linked provincial registries in Alberta, Canada, were accessed and patients with CRC diagnosed between 2004 and 2018 were identified. The National Ambulatory Care reporting system was used to identify patients who visited an ED within 3 months of a diagnosis of CRC. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with any ED visits as well as frequent (≥3) ED visits. Results: A total of 25,310 patients with CRC were included in the current study. These include 10,126 patients (40%) who had at least one visit to the ED in the 3 months before a diagnosis of CRC diagnosis and 613 patients (2.4%) who visited the ED multiple (≥3) times. The following factors were associated with any visit to an ED: older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.010; 95% CI: 1.008–1.012), female gender (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.16–1.30), higher comorbidity index (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.35–1.41), metastatic disease (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 2.23–2.53), proximal tumors (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.50–1.68) and North zone (OR vs south zone: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.55–1.98). Conclusion: It is not uncommon for CRC patients to visit the ED at least once in the 3 months prior to having such a diagnosis. Factors associated with frequent pre diagnosis emergency visits included female gender, higher burden of comorbid disease, advanced stage, proximal tumors and living in the North zone of Alberta (where there is limited access to specialist care).
Supplementary Material
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
1.
Canadian Cancer Society. Release notice - Canadian cancer statistics 2019. Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev. Can. 39(8–9), 255 (2019).
2.
Abdel-Rahman O. Patterns and trends of cancer screening in Canada: results from a contemporary National Survey. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Netw. 19(1), 68–76 (2021).
3.
Click B, Pinsky PF, Hickey T, Doroudi M, Schoen RE. Association of colonoscopy adenoma findings with long-term colorectal cancer incidence. JAMA 319(19), 2021–2031 (2018).
4.
Decker KM, Lambert P, Nugent Z, Biswanger N, Samadder J, Singh H. Time trends in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer with obstruction, perforation, and emergency admission after the introduction of population-based organized screening. JAMA Netw. Open 3(5), e205741 (2020).
• Reviews the patterns of emergency presentations of patients with colorectal cancer.
5.
Weithorn D, Arientyl V, Solsky I et al. Diagnosis setting and colorectal cancer outcomes: the impact of cancer diagnosis in the emergency department. J. Surg. Res. 255, 164–171 (2020).
6.
Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Ríos-Motta R, Marín-Centeno H, Cruz-Correa MR, Ortiz AP. Emergency presentation and short-term survival among patients with colorectal cancer enrolled in the government health plan of Puerto Rico. Health Serv. Res. Manag. Epidemiol. 3, 2333392816646670 (2016).
7.
Esteva M, Ruidíaz M, Sánchez MA et al. Emergency presentation of colorectal patients in Spain. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0203556 (2018).
8.
Alberta Health Services. AHS map and zone overview. https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/about/publications/ahs-ar-2019/zones.html
9.
Wang H, Gies N, Wong C, Sadowski D, Moysey B, Fedorak RN. Patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening underestimate their cancer risk and delay presentation for screening. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 26(7), 419–423 (2012).
10.
Smith LK, Pope C, Botha JL. Patients' help-seeking experiences and delay in cancer presentation: a qualitative synthesis. Lancet 366(9488), 825–831 (2005).
11.
Wang Y, Hunt K, Nazareth I, Freemantle N, Petersen I. Do men consult less than women? An analysis of routinely collected UK general practice data. BMJ Open 3(8), e003320 (2013).
12.
Abdel-Rahman O, Koski S, Mulder K. Real-world patterns of chemotherapy administration and attrition among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. (2020) (Epub ahead of print).
13.
Cancer Care Alberta. The 2019 report on cancer statistics in Alberta (ROCSIA). https://public.tableau.com/profile/cancercontrol.ab#!/vizhome/The2019ReportonCancerStatisticsinAlberta/Highlights?publish=yes
14.
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 188(5), 340–348 (2016).
15.
Odeny TA, Farha N, Hildebrandand H et al. Association between primary perioperative CEA ratio, tumor site, and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Med. 9(12), 3848 (2020).
16.
Abdel-Rahman O, Cheung WY. Population-based assessment of the performance of sigmoidoscopy in the detection of colorectal cancer: implications for future screening recommendations. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 10(2), 354–356 (2019).
17.
Alberta Health Services. Provincial colorectal cancer andlymphoma diagnosis pathways. https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/about/scn/ahs-scn-cancer-colorectal-cancer-and-lymphoma-diagnosis-pathways.pdf#:∼:text=Provincial%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20and%20Lymphoma%20Diagnosis%20Pathways.%20While,process,%20and%20long%20periods%20of%20time%20in
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Pages: 311 - 318
PubMed: 35189709
Copyright
© 2022 Future Medicine Ltd.
History
Received: 3 July 2021
Accepted: 17 December 2021
Published online: 22 February 2022
Keywords:
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Article usage data only available from February 2023. Historical article usage data, showing the number of article downloads, is available upon request.
Citations
How to Cite
Patterns of emergency department visits preceding colorectal cancer diagnosis: a population-based study. (2022) Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. DOI: 10.2217/cer-2021-0163
Export citation
Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.
Citing Literature
- Christine Huynh, Prisca C. Obidike, Britney He, Christopher L. Cramer, Florence E. Turrentine, Charles M. Friel, Traci Hedrick, Sook C. Hoang, Influence of Patient Demographics, Symptoms, and Initial Provider Type on Timeliness of Rectal Cancer Diagnosis, Journal of Surgical Research, 10.1016/j.jss.2026.04.041, 324, (191-199), (2026).
- Ruth Swann, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Greg Rubin, Lucy Elliss-Brookes, Sean McPhail, Predictors and consequences of different pathways to emergency diagnosis of cancer in England: Evidence from linked national audit and cancer registration data, Cancer Epidemiology, 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102607, 92, (102607), (2024).
- Anna Pujadas Botey, Ashley J. Watson, Paula J. Robson, Improving colorectal cancer in Alberta, Canada: a qualitative study of patients and close contacts’ perceptions on diagnosis following an emergency department presentation, BMC Health Services Research, 10.1186/s12913-024-11508-9, 24, 1, (2024).
- Omar Abdel-Rahman, Sunita Ghosh, Patterns of emergency department visits before diagnosis with digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms, International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 10.1007/s00384-023-04443-4, 38, 1, (2023).
