Skip to main content
First page of PDF

Supplementary Material

File (prep-it collaborators_15feb2022.docx)

References

1.
Kim KK, Khodyakov D, Marie K et al. A novel stakeholder engagement approach for patient-centered outcomes research. Med. Care 56(1 Suppl. 10), S41 (2018).
2.
Boudes M, Robinson P, Bertelsen N et al. What do stakeholders expect from patient engagement: are these expectations being met? Health Expect. 21(6), 1035–1045 (2018).
3.
Hahn DL, Hoffmann AE, Felzien M, LeMaster JW, Xu J, Fagnan LJ. Tokenism in patient engagement. Fam. Pract. 34(3), 290–295 (2017).
4.
Kendell C, Urquhart R, Petrella J, MacDonald S, McCallum M. Evaluation of an advisory committee as a model for patient engagement. Patient Exp. J. 1(2), 62–70 (2014).
5.
DeCamp M, Dukhanin V, Hebert LC, Himmelrich S, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA. Patients' views about patient engagement and representation in healthcare governance. J. Healthc. Manag. 64(5), 332–346 (2019).
6.
Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 307(15), 1587–1588 (2012).
7.
Slobogean GP, Sprague S, Wells J et al. Effectiveness of iodophor vs chlorhexidine solutions for surgical site infections and unplanned reoperations for patients who underwent fracture repair: the PREP-IT Master Protocol. JAMA Netw. Open 3(4), e202215–e202215 (2020).