Skip to main content
Free access
Research Article
17 May 2017

Quality-adjusted life year difference in patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia treated with cariprazine and risperidone

Abstract

Aim: Our study aimed at estimating differences in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain for patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia treated with cariprazine compared with risperidone. Materials & methods: A Markov model was built, based on the Mohr–Lenert approach and data derived from clinical trials, to estimate potential QALY gains of patients. Results: Patients had higher probability of reaching better health states treated with cariprazine compared with risperidone. In the model, this resulted in an estimated QALY gain of 0.029 per patient, after 1 year of treatment. Conclusion: Cariprazine, which showed clinically meaningful improvement in the symptoms, and personal and social performance, can also provide significant QALY gain in the treatment of patients with predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared with risperidone.

Supplementary Material

File (suppl_appendix.docx)

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
World Health Organization. Schizophrenia Fact sheet (2016). www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs397/en/
2.
Desai PR, Lawson KA, Barner JC, Rascati KL. Estimating the direct and indirect costs for community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia. J. Pharm. Health Serv. Res. 4(4), 187–194 (2013).
3.
Cloutier M, Aigbogun MS, Guerin A et al. The economic burden of schizophrenia in the United States in 2013. J. Clin. Psychiatry 77(6), 764–771 (2016).
4.
Tandon R, Nasrallah HA, Keshavan MS. Schizophrenia, “just the facts” 4. Clinical features and conceptualization. Schizophr. Res. 110(1–3), 1–23 (2009).
5.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition). American Psychiatric Publishing, VA, USA (2013).
6.
Chue P, Lalonde JK. Addressing the unmet needs of patients with persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia: emerging pharmacological treatment options. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 10, 777–789 (2014).
7.
Debelle M, Németh G, Szalai E et al. Cariprazine as monotherapy for the treatment of schizophrenia patients with predominant negative symptoms: a double-blind, active controlled trial. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 25, S510 (2015).
8.
Németh G, Laszlovszky I, Czobor P et al. Cariprazine versus risperidone monotherapy for treatment of predominant negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet 389(10074), 1103–1113 (2017).
•• Summarizes the results of the clinical trial that served as the basis of the calculations of the model.
9.
Németh G, Debelle M, Laszlovszky I et al. Monotherapy treatment with cariprazine for the treatment of predominant negative symptoms of patients with schizophrenia: a double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial. Eur. Psychiatry 33, S256–S257 (2016).
10.
Citrome L. Cariprazine: chemistry, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism, clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Expert Opin. Drug Metabol. Toxicol. 9(2), 193–206 (2013).
11.
Nakamura T, Kubota T, Iwakaji A, Imada M, Kapas M, Morio Y. Clinical pharmacology study of cariprazine (MP-214) in patients with schizophrenia (12-week treatment). Drug Design Dev. Ther. 10, 327–338 (2016).
12.
Pásztor Mészáros G, Kapás M, Borsos M et al. Pharmacokinetics of RGH-188, a new dopamine D3/D2 antagonist/partial agonist atypical antipsychotic, in healthy subjects. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 17, S451–S452 (2007).
13.
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 13(2), 261–276 (1987).
14.
Mohr PE, Cheng CM, Claxton K et al. The heterogeneity of schizophrenia in disease states. Schizophr. Res. 71(1), 83–95 (2004).
•• One of the three publications that explain the foundations of the Mohr–Lenert method, which was the basis of the Markov model structure.
15.
Lenert LA, Sturley AP, Rapaport MH, Chavez S, Mohr PE, Rupnow M. Public preferences for health states with schizophrenia and a mapping function to estimate utilities from positive and negative symptom scale scores. Schizophr. Res. 71(1), 155–165 (2004).
•• One of the three publications that explain the foundations of the Mohr–Lenert method, which was the basis of the Markov model structure.
16.
Lenert LA, Rupnow MF, Elnitsky C. Application of a disease-specific mapping function to estimate utility gains with effective treatment of schizophrenia. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 3(1), 57 (2005).
•• One of the three publications that explain the foundations of the Mohr–Lenert method, which was the basis of the Markov model structure.
17.
Lenert LA, Sturley AP, Rapaport MH, Chavez S, Mohr PE, Rupnow M. Corrigendum to Public preferences for health states with schizophrenia and a mapping function to estimate utilities from positive and negative symptom scale scores [Schizophr. Res. 71(1) (2004) 155–165]. Schizophr. Res. 80, 135–136 (2005).
18.
Elfadaly FG, Garthwaite PH. Eliciting Dirichlet and Gaussian copula prior distributions for multinomial models. Stat. Computing 27(2), 449–467 (2017).
19.
Glick ID, He X, Davis JM. First-generation antipsychotics: current status. Primary Psychiatry 13(12), 51–58 (2006).
20.
Furiak NM, Ascher-Svanum H, Klein RW et al. Cost-effectiveness model comparing olanzapine and other oral atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia in the United States. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 7, 4 (2009).
21.
García-Ruiz AJ, Pérez-Costillas L, Montesinos AC, Alcalde J, Oyagüez I, Casado MA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antipsychotics in reducing schizophrenia relapses. Health Econ. Rev. 2, 8 (2012).
22.
Park T, Kuntz KM. Cost-effectiveness of second-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. Value Health 17(4), 310–319 (2014).
23.
Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, Mcevoy JP et al. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 353(12), 1209–1223 (2005).
• Basis of the calculations regarding switching rates.
24.
Severens JL, Milne RJ. Discounting health outcomes in economic evaluation: the ongoing debate. Value Health 7(4), 397–401 (2004).
25.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Demographic Yearbook 2012. Hungarian Central Statistical Office, Budapest, Hungary (2013).
26.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal 2013 (2013). www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg9/chapter/foreword