Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research welcoming the submission of study design protocols to foster transparency and trust in real-world evidence
Publication: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
References
1.
Hopewell S, Boutron I, Chan AW et al. An update to SPIRIT and CONSORT reporting guidelines to enhance transparency in randomized trials. Nat. Med. 28(9), 1740–1743 (2022).
2.
Spahr A, Rosli Z, Legault M et al. The LORIS MyeliNeuroGene rare disease database for natural history studies and clinical trial readiness. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 16(1), 328 (2021).
3.
US Food and Drug Administration. Rare diseases: natural history studies for drug development. www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/rare-diseases-natural-history-studies-drug-development
4.
Wang SV, Pinheiro S, Hua W et al. STaRT-RWE: structured template for planning and reporting on the implementation of real world evidence studies. Brit. Med. J. 372, m4856 (2021).
5.
ISPOR. Real-world evidence transparency initiative. www.ispor.org/strategic-initiatives/real-world-evidence/real-world-evidence-transparency-initiative
6.
Wang SV, Pottegård A, Crown W et al. HARmonized Protocol template to enhance reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real-world evidence studies on treatment effects: a Good Practices Report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR Task Force. Value Health 25(10), 1663–1672 (2022).
7.
Wang SV, Pinheiro S, Hua W et al. STaRT-RWE: structured template for planning and reporting on the implementation of real world evidence studies. Brit. Med. J. 372, m4856 (2021).
8.
Seewald MJ, Plumb JM, Gutierrez B et al. Strengthening pharma's contract with society: the value of trusted partnerships between pharma and healthcare facilitated by real-world data. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 9(3), 155–159 (2020).
9.
Orsini LS, Berger M, Crown W et al. Improving transparency to build trust in real-world secondary data studies for hypothesis testing – why, what, and how: recommendations and a road map from the Real-World Evidence Transparency Initiative. Value Health 23(9), 1128–1136 (2020).
10.
ISPOR. Real-World Evidence Registry. www.ispor.org/strategic-initiatives/real-world-evidence/real-world-evidence-registry
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 The Authors. This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License
History
Received: 25 November 2022
Accepted: 25 November 2022
Published online: 21 December 2022
Keywords:
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Article usage data only available from February 2023. Historical article usage data, showing the number of article downloads, is available upon request.
Citations
How to Cite
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research welcoming the submission of study design protocols to foster transparency and trust in real-world evidence. (2022) Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. DOI: 10.2217/cer-2022-0197
Export citation
Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.
Citing Literature
- Olmo R. van den Akker, Robert T. Thibault, John P. A. Ioannidis, Susanne G. Schorr, Daniel Strech, Transparency in the secondary use of health data: assessing the status quo of guidance and best practices, Royal Society Open Science, 10.1098/rsos.241364, 12, 3, (2025).
- Sylvain Mathieu, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Laurent Renard Triché, Emmanuel Coudeyre, De Chazeron Ingrid, Finotto Thomas, Catherine Laporte, Xavier Moisset, Ludovic Samalin, Guillaume Villatte, Bruno Pereira, Damien Bouvier, Anthony Buisson, Ingrid De Chazeron, Frédéric Dutheil, Romain Eschalier, Emmanuel Futier, Johan Gagnière, Romain Guieze, Matthieu Jabaudon, Etienne Merlin, Fares Moustafa, Protocol publication rate and comparison between article, registry and protocol in RCTs, BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10.1186/s12874-025-02471-y, 25, 1, (2025).
- Riddhi Doshi, Victoria Divino, Luke Greenwalt, Mitchell DeKoven, Methodological standards for comparative effectiveness research: considerations for evidentiary review for medicare drug price negotiation, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 10.1080/14737167.2025.2453503, 25, 4, (451-457), (2025).
