Skip to main content
Free access
Research Article
2 November 2018

Real-world US healthcare costs of psoriasis for biologic-naive patients initiating apremilast or biologics

Abstract

Aim: Biologics and apremilast have advanced psoriasis management by adding treatment options. This study evaluated persistence, adherence and healthcare costs among biologic-naive patients receiving apremilast or biologics. Methods: Administrative claims data for adults starting apremilast or biologics from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2016 were matched based on demographics. Results: Apremilast (n = 703) and biologics (n = 1378) had similar baseline characteristics. 12-month persistence and adherence rates were similar. Adjusted total healthcare costs were lower with apremilast versus biologics (p < 0.001) due to lower total outpatient pharmacy costs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Real-world apremilast users had similar adherence and lower total healthcare costs versus biologic users. Apremilast's cost advantage was evident regardless of whether the patients were persistent or nonpersistent, or switched or did not switch treatments.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
1.
Feldman SR, Goffe B, Rice G et al. The challenge of managing psoriasis: unmet medical needs and stakeholder perspectives. Am. Health Drug Benefits 9(9), 504–513 (2016).
• Describes how psoriasis is a complex, costly disease and how patients and healthcare providers manage the various psoriasis treatment options so patients can obtain optimal care.
2.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease. Questions and answers about psoriasis (2017). www.niams.nih.gov/health-topics/psoriasis.
4.
Bell LM, Sedlack R, Beard CM, Perry HO, Michet CJ, Kurland LT. Incidence of psoriasis in Rochester, Minn, 1980–1983. Arch. Dermatol. 127(8), 1184–1187 (1991).
5.
Pathirana D, Ormerod AD, Saiag P et al. European S3-guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 23(Suppl. 2), 1–70 (2009).
6.
Vide J, Magina S. Moderate to severe psoriasis treatment challenges through the era of biological drugs. An. Bras. Dermatol. 92(5), 668–674 (2017).
7.
Brezinski EA, Dhillon JS, Armstrong AW. Economic burden of psoriasis in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 151(6), 651–658 (2015).
8.
National Psoriasis Foundation. About psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in children (2018). www.psoriasis.org/parents/about-psoriasis.
9.
National Psoriasis Foundation. Topical treatments (2018). www.psoriasis.org/about-psoriasis/treatments/topicals.
10.
National Psoriasis Foundation. Traditional systemic medications (2018). www.psoriasis.org/about-psoriasis/treatments/systemics.
11.
Zerilli T, Ocheretyaner E. Apremilast (Otezla): a new oral treatment for adults with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. PT 40(8), 495–500 (2015).
12.
Guerriero F, Orlando V, Monetti VM, Russo V, Menditto E. Biological therapy utilization, switching, and cost among patients with psoriasis: retrospective analysis of administrative databases in Southern Italy. Clinicoecon. Outcomes Res. 9, 741–748 (2017).
13.
Gisondi P, Del Giglio M, Girolomoni G. Treatment approaches to moderate to severe psoriasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(11), E2427 (2017).
14.
National Psoriasis Foundation. Moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: biologic drugs (2018). www.psoriasis.org/about-psoriasis/treatments/biologics.
15.
Palfreeman AC, McNamee KE, McCann FE. New developments in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a focus on apremilast. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 7, 201–210 (2013).
• Models the cost per responder for psoriasis patients receiving etanercept or ustekinumab treatment, and the article provides an older estimate of the costs of psoriasis patients treated with select biologics.
16.
Martin S, Feldman SR, Augustin M, Szapary P, Schenkel B. Cost per responder analysis of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J. Dermatolog. Treat. 22(3), 138–143 (2011).
• Reports the average wholesale cost of biologics over time, which serves as an estimate of the price of biologics for patients with psoriasis.
17.
Cheng J, Feldman SR. The cost of biologics for psoriasis is increasing. Drugs Context 3, 212266 (2014).
18.
Reed M, Crosbie D. Apremilast in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a perspective review. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 9(2), 45–53 (2017).
19.
Goldenberg G, Lanoue J, Dong J. New oral therapies for psoriasis: a comprehensive review. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 9(8), 25–28 (2016).
20.
Thorneloe RJ, Griffiths CEM, Emsley R, Ashcroft DM, Cordingley L. Intentional and unintentional medication non-adherence in psoriasis: the role of patients’ medication beliefs and habit strength. J. Invest. Dermatol. 138(4), 785–794 (2018).
21.
Singh SM, Narang T, Vinay K et al. Clinic-based group multi-professional education causes significant decline in psoriasis severity: a randomized open label pilot study. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 8(6), 454–459 (2017).