Skip to main content
Open access
Research Article
15 August 2018

Comparative effectiveness of avelumab versus chemotherapy in Merkel cell carcinoma: innovative use of patient insights

Abstract

Aim: To assess patient experience with chemotherapy and avelumab in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC). Methods: In the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial, chemotherapy-refractory mMCC patients could participate in optional qualitative interviews at baseline documenting recollection of previous chemotherapy experience, and at weeks 13/25 documenting current experience with avelumab. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy subscale for melanoma questionnaire (FACT-M) was administered in parallel. Results: In our sample, chemotherapy was associated with an unpleasant experience. On selected FACT-M items addressing chemotherapy-impacted concepts, most patients receiving avelumab were improved or stable; few worsened. In addition, a few patients spontaneously reported experiencing less toxicity with avelumab than experienced during previous chemotherapy. Conclusion: This approach merging qualitative and quantitative data suggests that mMCC patients report a better experience with avelumab than with chemotherapy.

Formats available

You can view the full content in the following formats:

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Lebbe C, Becker JC, Grob JJ et al. Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur. J. Cancer 51(16), 2396–2403 (2015).
2.
Paulson KG, Park SY, Vandeven NA et al. Merkel cell carcinoma: Current US incidence and projected increases based on changing demographics. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78(3), 457.e2–463.e2 (2017).
3.
Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP, Brennan MF, Busam K, Coit DG. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J. Clin. Oncol. 23(10), 2300–2309 (2005).
4.
Tai PT, Yu E, Winquist E et al. Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine/Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: case series and review of 204 cases. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(12), 2493–2499 (2000).
5.
Santamaria-Barria JA, Boland GM, Yeap BY, Nardi V, Dias-Santagata D, Cusack JC Jr. Merkel cell carcinoma: 30-year experience from a single institution. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 20(4), 1365–1373 (2013).
6.
Voog E, Biron P, Martin JP, Blay JY. Chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer 85(12), 2589–2595 (1999).
7.
Becker JC, Lorenz E, Ugurel S et al. Evaluation of real-world treatment outcomes in patients with distant metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma following second-line chemotherapy in Europe. Oncotarget 8(45), 79731–79741 (2017).
•• Article supporting the limited efficacy of chemotherapy in Merkel cell carcinoma (MMC) patients.
8.
Cowey CL, Mahnke L, Espirito J, Helwig C, Oksen D, Bharmal M. Real-world treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma treated with chemotherapy in the USA. Future Oncol. 13(19), 1699–1710 (2017).
•• Article supporting the limited efficacy of chemotherapy in MMC patients.
9.
Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, Phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 17(10), 1374–1385 (2016).
• The article is presenting the efficacy and safety results from the trial.
10.
Kaufman HL, Russell JS, Hamid O et al. Durable responses to avelumab (anti-PD-L1) in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma progressed after chemotherapy: 1-year efficacy update. Presented at: 2017 AACR Annual Meeting. WAUSA, 1–5 April 2017.
11.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Guidance for Industry Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medicinal Product Development to Support Labelling Claims (2009).
12.
Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK et al. EORTC QLQ-C30. EORTC, Belgium (2008). http://groups.eortc.be/qol/eortc-qlq-c30.
13.
Dueck AC, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA et al. Validity and reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 1(8), 1051–1059 (2015).
14.
Cleeland CS. The M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. The University of Texas Anderson Cancer Center, TX, USA (2016).
15.
Cormier JN, Davidson L, Xing Y, Webster K, Cella D. Measuring quality of life in patients with melanoma: development of the FACT-melanoma subscale. J. Support. Oncol. 3(2), 139–145 (2005).
16.
Bharmal M, Fofana F, Barbosa CD et al. Psychometric properties of the FACT-M questionnaire in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 15(1), 247 (2017).
• Presents the psychometric validation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma questionnaire in MMC population.
17.
Kaufman HL, Hunger M, Hennessy M, Schlichting M, Bharmal M. Nonprogression with avelumab treatment associated with gains in quality of life in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Future Oncol. 14(3), 255–266 (2018).
18.
Curry L, Nunez-Smith M. Mixed Methods in Health Sciences Research: A Practical Primer. SAGE Publications (2014).
19.
Cormier JN, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE et al. Prospective assessment of the reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the functional assessment of cancer Therapy-Melanoma questionnaire. Cancer 112(10), 2249–2257 (2008).
20.
Friese S, Ringmayr TG. ATLAS.ti. 7 User Manual. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (2013). https://atlasti.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/atlasti_v7_manual_201312.pdf?q=/uploads/media/atlasti_v7_manual_201312.pdf.