Development of a veteran engagement toolkit for researchers
Abstract
Aim: Engaging patients in the planning, implementation and dissemination of research can increase the credibility and relevance of results and lead to higher quality, more patient-centered care. Veterans have unique experiences and healthcare needs, making their input on research related to their care particularly important. However, existing veteran engagement resources primarily focus on veterans who receive care through the Veterans Health Administration (VA). This excludes those veterans – the majority – who do not use the VA for healthcare. Methods: To address this gap, we developed a veteran engagement toolkit that was informed by the work of both VA and non-VA researchers across the USA. Results: The resulting toolkit provides guidance on essential engagement activities relevant to researchers in a variety of settings. Conclusion: Investigators wishing to engage the veteran community may benefit from the experience and lessons summarized in this veteran-informed toolkit, in addition to resources directed at informing community engagement more generally.
Formats available
You can view the full content in the following formats:
References
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
1.
Borden WB, Chiang YP, Kronick R. Bringing patient-centered outcomes research to life. Value Health 18(4), 355–357 (2015).
2.
Roehr B. More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts. BMJ 341, c4193 (2010).
3.
Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 312(15), 1513–1514 (2014).
• Provides background on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and an overview of the rationale behind engaging stakeholders in research.
4.
Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 14(1), 89 (2014).
5.
Forsythe L, Heckert A, Margolis MK, Schrandt S, Frank L. Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Qual. Life Res. 27(1), 17–31 (2017).
6.
Khodyakov D, Stockdale SE, Smith N, Booth M, Altman L, Rubenstein LV. Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel. Health Expect. 20(1), 130–145 (2017).
• This study evaluated opinions within the Veterans Health Administration regarding patient engagement by having experts rate the desirability and feasibility of different engagement approaches. The authors describe the benefits and challenges posed by these different strategies.
7.
Institute of Medicine. Committee on Quality of Health Care in A. Crossing The Quality Chasm: A New Health System For The 21st Century. National Academy Press, DC, USA (2001).
•• This landmark document identified critical shortcomings in the American healthcare system and outlined aims for improvement. One of these aims was to make care more patient-centered by including patients in decision-making on healthcare priorities and outcomes.
8.
Forsythe LP, Frank L, Walker KO et al. Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 4(1), 11–25 (2015).
9.
Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(2), 181–194 (2012).
10.
Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual. Life Res. 24(5), 1033–1041 (2015).
• This article provides an overview to Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute’s approach to engagement in research.
11.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Engagement rubric for applicants (2016). www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf
12.
US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA HSR&D Cyberseminars (2018). www.HSR&D.research.va.gov/cyberseminars/
•• This site contains several archived trainings on engaging veterans in research.
13.
US Department of Veterans Affairs. HSR&D major priority domains and high-priority research topics (2016). www.HSR&D.research.va.gov/funding/PriorityDomains2017.pdf
14.
US Department of Veterans Affairs. VA utilization profile, FY 2016 (2017). www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/QuickFacts/VA_Utilization_Profile.PDF
15.
Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T et al. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29(12), 1692–1701 (2014).
16.
Devine EB, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Devlin A et al. A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State's Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66(8 Suppl.), S122–S129 (2013).
17.
Ellis L, Kass N. Patient engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: challenges, facilitators and actions to strengthen the field. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 6(4), 363–373 (2017).
18.
Woolf SH, Zimmerman E, Haley A, Krist AH. Authentic engagement of patients and communities can transform research, practice, and policy. Health Aff. (Millwood), 35(4), 590–594 (2016).
19.
Lavallee DC, Williams CJ, Tambor ES, Deverka PA. Stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research: how will we measure success? J. Comp. Eff. Res. 1(5), 397–407 (2012).
20.
Mullins CD, Abdulhalim AM, Lavallee DC. Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA 307(15), 1587–1588 (2012).
21.
Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research. Community engagement studio (2017). https://victr.vanderbilt.edu/pub/message.html?message_id=161
22.
Mosack KE, Wendorf AR, Brouwer AM et al. Veterans service organization engagement in 'POWER', a peer-led hypertension intervention. Chronic Illn. 8(4), 252–264 (2012).
23.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. (2018). Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute website. www.pcori.org
24.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. PCORI compensation framework for engaged research partners (2015). www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/PCORICompensation-Framework-for-Engaged-Research-Partners.pdf
25.
General Services Administration Office of Governmentwide Policy. FACA FAQs for managers (2008). www.fs.fed.us/emc/nepa/ecr2008/sessions/materials/25/FACA%20FAQs%20for%20Managers.pdf
26.
HIPxChange. Engaging Veterans in Research Toolkit. www.hipxchange.org/EngagingVeterans
27.
VA Quality Enhancement Resources Initiative. www.queri.research.va.gov/tools/default.cfm
28.
AVAC. Stakeholder engagement toolkit for HIV prevention trials (2012). www.avac.org/resource/stakeholder-engagement-toolkit-hiv-prevention-trials
29.
HIPxChange. Tools for stakeholder engagement in research (2017). www.hipxchange.org/StakeholderEngagementTools
•• This webpage contains a wealth of resources related to stakeholder engagement in research.
30.
Planetree. Patient engagement in research: a toolkit for patient-family advisory councils (2016). http://planetree.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Patient-Engagementin-Research-A-Toolkit-for-PFACs.pdf
31.
INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers (2017). www.invo.org.uk/resourcecentre/resource-for-researchers/
32.
McKenzie A, Hanley R. Planning for consumer and community participation in health and medical research: a practical guide for health and medical researchers. University of Western Australia (2014). www.involvingpeopleinresearch.org.au/find-out-more/our-resources/the-purplebook
33.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Veterans' Action League (VAL): building capacity to engage veterans in PCOR and CER activities (2017). www.pcori.org/research-results/2016/veterans-action-league-val-building-capacity-engage-veterans-pcor-and-cer
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2018 Future Medicine Ltd.
History
Received: 15 December 2017
Accepted: 26 March 2018
Published online: 1 June 2018
Keywords:
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Article Usage
Article usage data only available from February 2023. Historical article usage data, showing the number of article downloads, is available upon request.
Citations
How to Cite
Development of a veteran engagement toolkit for researchers. (2018) Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research. DOI: 10.2217/cer-2017-0101
Export citation
Select the citation format you wish to export for this article or chapter.
Citing Literature
- Ralph Richards, Ananya Balaji, Crystal Shipp, Mary Aurtrey, Angel Ingram, Richard Williams, Andrew Tackett, Johanne Eliacin, Sujuan Gao, David Johnson, Emily Nicklett, Omolola A. Adeoye‐Olatunde, Andrew Saykin, Sophia Wang, Characterization of barriers and facilitators to recruiting veterans to participate in Alzheimer's disease biomarker research: a cross‐sectional survey, Alzheimer's & Dementia: Behavior & Socioeconomics of Aging, 10.1002/bsa3.70076, 2, 2, (2026).
- Candice Presseau, Sarah A. Walls, Nichole Murray-Swank, Galina A. Portnoy, Suzanne E. Decker, Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers, Steve Martino, The Promise of a Retreat: Perspectives of U.S. Women Veterans and Interdisciplinary Experts on the Development of a Retreat-Based Suicide Prevention Program for Violence-Exposed Women Veterans, Violence Against Women, 10.1177/10778012241303471, 32, 1, (24-46), (2025).
- Nicholas A. Rattray, Sean A. Baird, Diana Natividad, Leah Danson, Richard M. Frankel, Gala True, Fostering Alignment and the Catalytic Potential of Community-Engaged Research With US Military Veterans and Advocates, Community Health Equity Research & Policy, 10.1177/2752535X241245270, 45, 2, (127-139), (2024).
- Leslie R.M. Hausmann, Carolyn Lamorte, Jamie L. Estock, Understanding the Context for Incorporating Equity into Quality Improvement Throughout a National Health Care System, Health Equity, 10.1089/heq.2023.0009, 7, 1, (312-320), (2023).
- Julie Babyar, Birds of a Feather: Advancing US Active Duty, Reservist, and Veteran Medical Research, Together, Public Integrity, 10.1080/10999922.2022.2124606, 26, 1, (40-81), (2022).
- Sara J. Knight, Jeffrey P. Haibach, Alison B. Hamilton, Jeff Whittle, Sarah S. Ono, Jorie Butler, Mark Flower, Carolyn D. Ray, Mary Jo Pugh, Susan L. Zickmund, Veteran Engagement in Health Services Research: a Conceptual Model, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10.1007/s11606-021-07309-z, 37, S1, (94-98), (2022).
- Shannon M. Nugent, Erika Cottrell, Sara J. Knight, Mark Helfand, Health Experiences Research as a Resource and Mechanism for Veteran Engagement in VA Healthcare Research and Care Delivery, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10.1007/s11606-021-07306-2, 37, S1, (118-122), (2022).
- Erica Hua Fletcher, Sonya Gabrielian, Lidia Brown, Juan Carlos Gough, Roya Ijadi-Maghsoodi, Ippolytos Kalofonos, Mariam Nazinyan, Erika Orellana, Kenneth Wells, Lessons Learned by Collaborating with Structurally Vulnerable Veterans via a Veterans Engagement Group, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10.1007/s11606-021-07075-y, 37, S1, (109-112), (2022).
- Luci K. Leykum, Erin P. Finley, Lauren S. Penney, Julie Parish Johnson, Jacqueline A. Pugh, Polly H. Noel, Engaging Veterans, caregivers, and system stakeholders to improve VA home and community‐based services , Health Services Research, 10.1111/1475-6773.13926, 57, S1, (66-76), (2022).
- McKinley Linda, Baubie Kelsey, Bartel Rosie, Flower Mark, Keating Julie A, Safdar Nasia, Engaging veterans in identifying key elements of environmental cleaning and disinfection for preventing healthcare-associated infections: A qualitative study, American Journal of Infection Control, 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.10.012, 50, 2, (148-154), (2022).